These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30255733)

  • 1. A D-vine copula mixed model for joint meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic tests.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3286-3300. PubMed ID: 30255733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2270-2286. PubMed ID: 26265766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests-A new approach based on copulas.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):739-748. PubMed ID: 29193212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A multinomial quadrivariate D-vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies in the presence of non-evaluable subjects.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2988-3005. PubMed ID: 32323626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An extended trivariate vine copula mixed model for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies in the presence of non-evaluable outcomes.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Int J Biostat; 2020 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 32772003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1410-1421. PubMed ID: 27487844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid copula mixed models for combining case-control and cohort studies in meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.
    Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2540-2553. PubMed ID: 29984634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of computational methods for aggregate data meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Zhao Y; Khan B; Negeri ZF
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 May; 24(1):111. PubMed ID: 38730436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A time-heterogeneous D-vine copula model for unbalanced and unequally spaced longitudinal data.
    Hoque ME; Acar EF; Torabi M
    Biometrics; 2023 Jun; 79(2):734-746. PubMed ID: 35233778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests accounting for disease prevalence: a new model using trivariate copulas.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(11):1912-24. PubMed ID: 25712874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial.
    Ma X; Nie L; Cole SR; Chu H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1596-619. PubMed ID: 23804970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical comparisons of meta-analysis methods for diagnostic studies: a meta-epidemiological study.
    Rosenberger KJ; Chu H; Lin L
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e055336. PubMed ID: 35534072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A D-vine copula-based model for repeated measurements extending linear mixed models with homogeneous correlation structure.
    Killiches M; Czado C
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):997-1005. PubMed ID: 29569339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
    Hattori S; Zhou XH
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graphical enhancements to summary receiver operating characteristic plots to facilitate the analysis and reporting of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
    Patel A; Cooper N; Freeman S; Sutton A
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Jan; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 32706182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Schlattmann P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Apr; 61(5):777-794. PubMed ID: 36656998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
    Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factor copula models for mixed data.
    Kadhem SH; Nikoloulopoulos AK
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 Nov; 74(3):365-403. PubMed ID: 34626487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skew-normal random-effects model for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies.
    Negeri ZF; Beyene J
    Biom J; 2020 Sep; 62(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 32022315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.