362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30256060)
1. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience.
Makmun D; Fauzi A; Shatri H
Clin Endosc; 2017 Sep; 50(5):486-490. PubMed ID: 28241408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Versus the Gold Standard Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Detecting Common Bile Duct Stones.
Anwer M; Asghar MS; Rahman S; Kadir S; Yasmin F; Mohsin D; Jawed R; Memon GM; Rasheed U; Hassan M
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12162. PubMed ID: 33489574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography compared to operative endoscopy in detecting biliary stones, a single center experience and review of literature.
Polistina FA; Frego M; Bisello M; Manzi E; Vardanega A; Perin B
World J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 7(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25918584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.
Hjartarson JH; Hannesson P; Sverrisson I; Blöndal S; Ívarsson B; Björnsson ES
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 51(10):1249-56. PubMed ID: 27181286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.
Badger WR; Borgert AJ; Kallies KJ; Kothari SN
Am J Surg; 2017 Aug; 214(2):251-255. PubMed ID: 27986260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in the Diagnosis of Choledocholithiasis: Do Benefits Outweigh the Costs?
Ward WH; Fluke LM; Hoagland BD; Zarow GJ; Held JM; Ricca RL
Am Surg; 2015 Jul; 81(7):720-5. PubMed ID: 26140894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparative study of ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in common duct stones].
Miao L; Fan ZN; Ji GZ; Wen W; Wang X; Xiong GY; Jiang GB; Wang M; Liu Z; Wu P
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 46(19):1465-7. PubMed ID: 19094622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT.
Anderson SW; Rho E; Soto JA
Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):418-27. PubMed ID: 18372450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of the current risk-stratified approach with computed tomography for suspected choledocholithiasis and its options when negative finding.
Lee HW; Song TJ; Park DH; Lee SS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH; Jun JH; Moon JE; Song YH
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2019 Aug; 18(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 31266728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Controversial issues in biliary pancreatitis: when should we perform MRCP and ERCP?
Cavdar F; Yildar M; Tellioğlu G; Kara M; Tilki M; Titiz Mİ
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(5):411-4. PubMed ID: 25200693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis.
Guarise A; Baltieri S; Mainardi P; Faccioli N
Radiol Med; 2005 Mar; 109(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 15775893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can MRCP replace the diagnostic role of ERCP for patients with choledochal cysts?
Park DH; Kim MH; Lee SK; Lee SS; Choi JS; Lee YS; Seo DW; Won HJ; Kim MY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2005 Sep; 62(3):360-6. PubMed ID: 16111952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of MRCP a ERCP in diagnosis of choledocholithiasis].
Vaníček J; Kyselová H; Kianička B; Mikulicová R; Bajgarová B; Trna J; Souček M; Riháček I; Spác J
Vnitr Lek; 2013 May; 59(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 23767448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
