524 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30256358)
1. Correlation of instrumental texture properties from textural profile analysis (TPA) with eating behaviours and macronutrient composition for a wide range of solid foods.
Wee MSM; Goh AT; Stieger M; Forde CG
Food Funct; 2018 Oct; 9(10):5301-5312. PubMed ID: 30256358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Independent and combined impact of texture manipulation on oral processing behaviours among faster and slower eaters.
Janani R; Tan VWK; Goh AT; Choy MJY; Lim AJ; Teo PS; Stieger M; Forde CG
Food Funct; 2022 Sep; 13(18):9340-9354. PubMed ID: 36017675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast or slow-foods? Describing natural variations in oral processing characteristics across a wide range of Asian foods.
Forde CG; Leong C; Chia-Ming E; McCrickerd K
Food Funct; 2017 Feb; 8(2):595-606. PubMed ID: 27883158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral processing characteristics of solid savoury meal components, and relationship with food composition, sensory attributes and expected satiation.
Forde CG; van Kuijk N; Thaler T; de Graaf C; Martin N
Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):208-219. PubMed ID: 23017464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation.
Lasschuijt MP; Mars M; Stieger M; Miquel-Kergoat S; de Graaf C; Smeets P
Physiol Behav; 2017 Jul; 176():76-83. PubMed ID: 28174138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Individual Differences in Eating Rate on Oral Processing, Bolus Properties and Post-Meal Glucose Responses.
Goh AT; Chatonidi G; Choy M; Ponnalagu S; Stieger M; Forde CG
Physiol Behav; 2021 Sep; 238():113495. PubMed ID: 34116051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Texture and savoury taste influences on food intake in a realistic hot lunch time meal.
Forde CG; van Kuijk N; Thaler T; de Graaf C; Martin N
Appetite; 2013 Jan; 60(1):180-186. PubMed ID: 23085683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oral processing behaviours of liquid, solid and composite foods are primarily driven by texture, mechanical and lubrication properties rather than by taste intensity.
Gonzalez-Estanol K; Libardi M; Biasioli F; Stieger M
Food Funct; 2022 May; 13(9):5011-5022. PubMed ID: 35438704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Changes in food bolus texture during mastication.
Wada S; Goto T; Fujimoto K; Watanabe M; Nagao K; Nakamichi A; Ichikawa T
J Texture Stud; 2017 Apr; 48(2):171-177. PubMed ID: 28370114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small food texture modifications can be used to change oral processing behaviour and to control ad libitum food intake.
Mosca AC; Torres AP; Slob E; de Graaf K; McEwan JA; Stieger M
Appetite; 2019 Nov; 142():104375. PubMed ID: 31326437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A description of an 'obesogenic' eating style that promotes higher energy intake and is associated with greater adiposity in 4.5year-old children: Results from the GUSTO cohort.
Fogel A; Goh AT; Fries LR; Sadananthan SA; Velan SS; Michael N; Tint MT; Fortier MV; Chan MJ; Toh JY; Chong YS; Tan KH; Yap F; Shek LP; Meaney MJ; Broekman BFP; Lee YS; Godfrey KM; Chong MFF; Forde CG
Physiol Behav; 2017 Jul; 176():107-116. PubMed ID: 28213204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Slow food: sustained impact of harder foods on the reduction in energy intake over the course of the day.
Bolhuis DP; Forde CG; Cheng Y; Xu H; Martin N; de Graaf C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93370. PubMed ID: 24695412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between instrumental and sensory texture profile of beef semitendinosus muscles with different textures.
Pematilleke N; Kaur M; Adhikari B; Torley PJ
J Texture Stud; 2022 Apr; 53(2):232-241. PubMed ID: 34250601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of food texture modifications on oral processing behaviour, bolus properties and postprandial glucose responses.
Choy JYM; Goh AT; Chatonidi G; Ponnalagu S; Wee SMM; Stieger M; Forde CG
Curr Res Food Sci; 2021; 4():891-899. PubMed ID: 34917949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age, gender, ethnicity and eating capability influence oral processing behaviour of liquid, semi-solid and solid foods differently.
Ketel EC; Aguayo-Mendoza MG; de Wijk RA; de Graaf C; Piqueras-Fiszman B; Stieger M
Food Res Int; 2019 May; 119():143-151. PubMed ID: 30884642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combined effect of eating speed instructions and food texture modification on eating rate, appetite and later food intake.
Wallace M; O'Hara H; Watson S; Goh AT; Forde CG; McKenna G; Woodside JV
Appetite; 2023 May; 184():106505. PubMed ID: 36828078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Human oral processing and texture profile analysis parameters: Bridging the gap between the sensory evaluation and the instrumental measurements.
Nishinari K; Fang Y; Rosenthal A
J Texture Stud; 2019 Oct; 50(5):369-380. PubMed ID: 31008516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of texture differences among varieties of cooked quinoa.
Wu G; Morris CF; Murphy KM
J Food Sci; 2014 Nov; 79(11):S2337-45. PubMed ID: 25308337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral processing behaviours that promote children's energy intake are associated with parent-reported appetitive traits: Results from the GUSTO cohort.
Fogel A; Fries LR; McCrickerd K; Goh AT; Quah PL; Chan MJ; Toh JY; Chong YS; Tan KH; Yap F; Shek LP; Meaney MJ; Broekman BFP; Lee YS; Godfrey KM; Fong Chong MF; Forde CG
Appetite; 2018 Jul; 126():8-15. PubMed ID: 29551400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variation in the Oral Processing of Everyday Meals Is Associated with Fullness and Meal Size; A Potential Nudge to Reduce Energy Intake?
Ferriday D; Bosworth ML; Godinot N; Martin N; Forde CG; Van Den Heuvel E; Appleton SL; Mercer Moss FJ; Rogers PJ; Brunstrom JM
Nutrients; 2016 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 27213451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
