184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30256495)
1. Assessment of Antagonist Enamel Wear and Clinical Performance of Full-Contour Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: One-Year Results of a Prospective Study.
Pathan MS; Kheur MG; Patankar AH; Kheur SM
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e411-e416. PubMed ID: 30256495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns.
Mundhe K; Jain V; Pruthi G; Shah N
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 25985742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.
Stober T; Bermejo JL; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 24447258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Evaluation of Wear of Natural Enamel Antagonist Against Glazed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns and Polished Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: An In Vivo Study.
Dondani JR; Pardeshi V; Gangurde A; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Deval P
Int J Prosthodont; 2023; 36(3):273–281. PubMed ID: 35998079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Kim MJ; Hsu SM; Abdulhameed N; Jenkins R; Neal D; Ren F; Clark AE
J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():19-27. PubMed ID: 29042241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns.
Stober T; Bermejo JL; Schwindling FS; Schmitter M
J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Aug; 43(8):621-9. PubMed ID: 27198539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Wear Of Enamel Antagonist To Monolithic Zirconia And Metal-Ceramic Crowns.
Deval P; Tembhurne J; Gangurde A; Chauhan M; Jaiswal N; Tiwari DK
Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(6):744–751. PubMed ID: 33750998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antagonist enamel tooth wear produced by different dental ceramic systems: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Mao Z; Beuer F; Hey J; Schmidt F; Sorensen JA; Prause E
J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104832. PubMed ID: 38211687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the wear of glazed and polished zirconia crowns and the opposing natural teeth: A clinical pilot study.
Selvaraj U; Koli DK; Jain V; Nanda A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):52-57. PubMed ID: 32665120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analysis on the wear of monolithic zirconia crowns on antagonist teeth.
Tang Z; Zhao X; Wang H
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Mar; 21(1):94. PubMed ID: 33663477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years.
Lohbauer U; Reich S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 May; 21(4):1165-1172. PubMed ID: 27277661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review.
Gou M; Chen H; Kang J; Wang H
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):598-603. PubMed ID: 30509545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monolithic zirconia crowns in the aesthetic zone in heavy grinders with severe tooth wear - An observational case-series.
Hansen TL; Schriwer C; Øilo M; Gjengedal H
J Dent; 2018 May; 72():14-20. PubMed ID: 29452242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical behavior of second-generation zirconia monolithic posterior restorations: Two-year results of a prospective study with Ex vivo analyses including patients with clinical signs of bruxism.
Koenig V; Wulfman C; Bekaert S; Dupont N; Le Goff S; Eldafrawy M; Vanheusden A; Mainjot A
J Dent; 2019 Dec; 91():103229. PubMed ID: 31722238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical Outcomes of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns with CAD/CAM Technology. A 1-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study of 65 Patients.
Konstantinidis I; Trikka D; Gasparatos S; Mitsias ME
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30424474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations.
Tang Z; Zhao X; Wang H; Liu B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Oct; 98(40):e17385. PubMed ID: 31577743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of antagonist enamel wear opposing full-coverage zirconia crowns versus other ceramics full-coverage crowns and natural enamel - An umbrella review.
Shah N; Nerkar H; Badwaik P; Ahuja B; Malu R; Bhanushali N
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2024 Jul; 24(3):217-224. PubMed ID: 38946503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Preliminary evaluation of clinical effect of computer aided design and computer aided manufacture zirconia crown].
Wang YG; Xing YX; Sun YC; Zhao YJ; Lü PJ; Wang Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 48(6):355-8. PubMed ID: 24120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review.
Passos SP; Torrealba Y; Major P; Linke B; Flores-Mir C; Nychka JA
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 24957813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
