BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30257058)

  • 21. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Statistical inference for time-to-event data in non-randomized cohorts with selective attrition.
    Wang T; Mao L; Cocco A; Kim K
    Stat Med; 2024 Jan; 43(2):216-232. PubMed ID: 37957033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Variance estimation for nucleotide substitution models.
    Chen W; Wang H
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Sep; 90():97-103. PubMed ID: 25981189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Leveraging auxiliary data to improve precision in inverse probability-weighted analyses.
    Zalla LC; Yang JY; Edwards JK; Cole SR
    Ann Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 74():75-83. PubMed ID: 35940394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
    Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consequences of Depletion of Susceptibles for Hazard Ratio Estimators Based on Propensity Scores.
    Fireman B; Gruber S; Zhang Z; Wellman R; Nelson JC; Franklin J; Maro J; Murray CR; Toh S; Gagne J; Schneeweiss S; Amsden L; Wyss R
    Epidemiology; 2020 Nov; 31(6):806-814. PubMed ID: 32841986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score.
    Williamson EJ; Forbes A; White IR
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(5):721-37. PubMed ID: 24114884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.
    Mao H; Li L; Yang W; Shen Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3745-3763. PubMed ID: 29855060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Propensity score matching for estimating a marginal hazard ratio.
    Wang T; Zhao H; Yang S; Tang S; Cui Z; Li L; Faries DE
    Stat Med; 2024 Jun; 43(14):2783-2810. PubMed ID: 38705726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A jackknife estimator of variance for Cox regression for correlated survival data.
    Lipsitz SR; Parzen M
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):291-8. PubMed ID: 8934598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso.
    Ju C; Benkeser D; van der Laan MJ
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):109-118. PubMed ID: 31350906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Monte Carlo evaluation of five interval estimators for the relative risk in sparse data.
    Lui KJ
    Biom J; 2006 Feb; 48(1):131-43. PubMed ID: 16544818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.
    Liu J; Ma Y; Wang L
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):910-923. PubMed ID: 29441521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Jackknife estimators of variance for parameter estimates from estimating equations with applications to clustered survival data.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Zhao L
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):842-6. PubMed ID: 7981404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cox regression model with doubly truncated data.
    Rennert L; Xie SX
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):725-733. PubMed ID: 29073330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shrinkage estimators for covariance matrices.
    Daniels MJ; Kass RE
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1173-84. PubMed ID: 11764258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Multiply robust matching estimators of average and quantile treatment effects.
    Yang S; Zhang Y
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2023 Mar; 50(1):235-265. PubMed ID: 36844478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Asymptotically efficient two-step estimators of the hazards ratio for follow-up studies and survival data.
    Anderson JR; Bernstein L
    Biometrics; 1985 Sep; 41(3):733-9. PubMed ID: 4074822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On variance estimation of target population created by inverse probability weighting.
    Chen J; Chen R; Feng Y; Tan M; Chen P; Wu Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Aug; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 37621147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variance reduction in the inverse probability weighted estimators for the average treatment effect using the propensity score.
    Liao J; Rohde C
    Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):660-667. PubMed ID: 33715153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.