2101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30257769)
1. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.
Bjørgul K; Novicoff WM; Andersen ST; Brevig K; Thu F; Wiig M; Ahlund O
J Orthop Traumatol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 20198405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Register of Joint Replacements of the Czech Republic.
Vavřík P; Landor I; Popelka S; Fialka R; Hach J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2014; 81 Suppl():3-68. PubMed ID: 25105887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term survival of the cemented Müller CDH stem: a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Salentiny Y; Zwicky L; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Oct; 138(10):1471-1477. PubMed ID: 30046893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can cemented dual-mobility cups be used without a reinforcement device in cases of mild acetabular bone stock alteration in total hip arthroplasty?
Haen TX; Lonjon G; Vandenbussche E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 26542070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Use of uncemented Beznoska acetabular cup - mid-term results at the orthopedic ward in Pelhrimov].
Letocha J; Behounek J; Skoták M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 17623608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparable Results With Porous Metal Augments in Combination With Either Cemented or Uncemented Cups in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An Analysis of One Hundred Forty-Seven Revisions at a Mean of Five Years.
Mahmoud AN; Sundberg M; Flivik G
J Arthroplasty; 2017 May; 32(5):1612-1617. PubMed ID: 28062151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
