These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30258058)
1. Physics-based forecasting of man-made earthquake hazards in Oklahoma and Kansas. Langenbruch C; Weingarten M; Zoback MD Nat Commun; 2018 Sep; 9(1):3946. PubMed ID: 30258058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? Langenbruch C; Zoback MD Sci Adv; 2016 Nov; 2(11):e1601542. PubMed ID: 28138533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma. Zhai G; Shirzaei M; Manga M; Chen X Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Aug; 116(33):16228-16233. PubMed ID: 31358640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?" by C. Langenbruch and M. D. Zoback. Goebel THW; Walter JI; Murray K; Brodsky EE Sci Adv; 2017 Aug; 3(8):e1700441. PubMed ID: 28808681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical physics models for aftershocks and induced seismicity. Luginbuhl M; Rundle JB; Turcotte DL Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2018 Nov; 377(2136):. PubMed ID: 30478209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The surge of earthquakes in Central Oklahoma has features of reservoir-induced seismicity. Johann L; Shapiro SA; Dinske C Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11505. PubMed ID: 30065351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to Comment on "How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?". Langenbruch C; Zoback MD Sci Adv; 2017 Aug; 3(8):eaao2277. PubMed ID: 28819648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maturity of nearby faults influences seismic hazard from hydraulic fracturing. Kozłowska M; Brudzinski MR; Friberg P; Skoumal RJ; Baxter ND; Currie BS Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(8):E1720-E1729. PubMed ID: 29432169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forecasting induced seismicity in Oklahoma using machine learning methods. Qin Y; Chen T; Ma X; Chen X Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9319. PubMed ID: 35661805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induced earthquakes. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Keranen KM; Weingarten M; Abers GA; Bekins BA; Ge S Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6195):448-51. PubMed ID: 24993347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks. Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The spatial footprint of injection wells in a global compilation of induced earthquake sequences. Goebel THW; Brodsky EE Science; 2018 Aug; 361(6405):899-904. PubMed ID: 30166486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures. Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cascading elastic perturbation in Japan due to the 2012 M w 8.6 Indian Ocean earthquake. Delorey AA; Chao K; Obara K; Johnson PA Sci Adv; 2015 Oct; 1(9):e1500468. PubMed ID: 26601289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discriminating between natural and anthropogenic earthquakes: insights from the Emilia Romagna (Italy) 2012 seismic sequence. Albano M; Barba S; Tarabusi G; Saroli M; Stramondo S Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7(1):282. PubMed ID: 28325937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reports on progress in physics the complex dynamics of earthquake fault systems: new approaches to forecasting and nowcasting of earthquakes. Rundle JB; Stein S; Donnellan A; Turcotte DL; Klein W; Saylor C Rep Prog Phys; 2021 May; 84(7):. PubMed ID: 33857928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of Seismicity Associated with USGS Identified Areas of Potentially Induced Seismicity. Barnes C; Halihan T Ground Water; 2019 Jan; 57(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 29532915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Continuing megathrust earthquake potential in Chile after the 2014 Iquique earthquake. Hayes GP; Herman MW; Barnhart WD; Furlong KP; Riquelme S; Benz HM; Bergman E; Barrientos S; Earle PS; Samsonov S Nature; 2014 Aug; 512(7514):295-8. PubMed ID: 25119028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discriminating between natural versus induced seismicity from long-term deformation history of intraplate faults. Magnani MB; Blanpied ML; DeShon HR; Hornbach MJ Sci Adv; 2017 Nov; 3(11):e1701593. PubMed ID: 29202029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]