These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

503 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30258125)

  • 1. Taking a peek into the editor's office.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2018 Oct; 20(10):1101. PubMed ID: 30258125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
    Nylenna M
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Editor's nitpicking.
    Castillo M
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2010 Sep; 31(8):1353-4. PubMed ID: 20203110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ideas regarding developing, submitting, reviewing, and publishing a scientific manuscript: an editor's perspective.
    Apuzzo ML
    World Neurosurg; 2014; 81(3-4):443-6. PubMed ID: 24720909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
    Pravinkumar E
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Data publishing and scientific journals: the future of the scientific paper in a world of shared data.
    De Schutter E
    Neuroinformatics; 2010 Oct; 8(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 20835853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publishing coronavirology: Peering into peer(less?) review.
    Pederson T
    FASEB J; 2020 Aug; 34(8):9825-9827. PubMed ID: 32803811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peering into peer review.
    Nat Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 4(7):1065. PubMed ID: 31222174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Independence Day.
    Heinemann MK
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.
    Senturia SD
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 14995024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoring integrity to the scientific literature: lowering the bar to raise our standards.
    Gordon SE
    J Gen Physiol; 2014 Dec; 144(6):495-7. PubMed ID: 25422501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New review of uniformity requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: pay attention to ethics!].
    Pulido M
    Med Clin (Barc); 2004 May; 122(17):661-3. PubMed ID: 15153346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tackling waste in publishing through portable peer review.
    Bell GP; Kvajo M
    BMC Biol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):146. PubMed ID: 30558673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
    Elmore SA
    Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commitment to Publication Quality and Integrity: A Message from the Journal's Editorial Board.
    Bassat Q; Bose A; Cartledge P; Collins EM; Jullien S; Lanaspa M; Simkiss D; Trehan I
    J Trop Pediatr; 2018 Oct; 64(5):355-359. PubMed ID: 30060246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. We are delighted to have received 273 replies from reviewers specifying their subspecialty interests. Introduction.
    Frank JD; Mouriquand P; Caldamone A; Malone PS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):223. PubMed ID: 22583554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.