These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30258823)

  • 1. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of the old and new classifications of toracolombar fractures.
    Lopes FAR; Ferreira APRB; Santos RAAD; Maçaneiro CH
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2018; 53(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 30258823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and Agreement of Different Spine Fracture Classification Systems: An Independent Intraobserver and Interobserver Study.
    Pishnamaz M; Balosu S; Curfs I; Uhing D; Laubach M; Herren C; Weber C; Hildebrand F; Willems P; Kobbe P
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jul; 115():e695-e702. PubMed ID: 29709750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability assessment of AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) for thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a multicentre study.
    Kaul R; Chhabra HS; Vaccaro AR; Abel R; Tuli S; Shetty AP; Das KD; Mohapatra B; Nanda A; Sangondimath GM; Bansal ML; Patel N
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1470-1476. PubMed ID: 27334493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.
    Cheng J; Liu P; Sun D; Qin T; Ma Z; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 27807778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons.
    Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Koerner JD; Dvorak MF; Kandziora F; Rajasekaran S; Aarabi B; Vialle LR; Fehlings MG; Schroeder GD; Reinhold M; Schnake KJ; Bellabarba C; Cumhur Öner F
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Apr; 25(4):1082-6. PubMed ID: 25599849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Reliability of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Classification System in Children: Results of a Multicenter Study.
    Mo AZ; Miller PE; Glotzbecker MP; Li Y; Fletcher ND; Upasani VV; Riccio AI; Hresko MT; Krengel WF; Spence D; Garg S; Hedequist DJ
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(5):e352-e356. PubMed ID: 32032218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation.
    Byun SE; Choi W; Choi Y; Ahn TK; Kim HK; Yoon S; Lee J; Choi DS
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1407-1412. PubMed ID: 31542310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Independent Inter- and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation of the AOSpine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Mar; 42(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 26630415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Campos M; Yurac R; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2185-92. PubMed ID: 26945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An independent inter- and intraobserver agreement assessment of the AOSpine sacral fracture classification system.
    Urrutia J; Meissner-Haecker A; Astur N; Valencia M; Yurac R; Camino-Willhuber G; Valacco M
    Spine J; 2021 Jul; 21(7):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 33577926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability Evaluation of the New AO Spine-DGOU Classification for Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures.
    Quinteros G; Cabrera JP; Urrutia J; Carazzo CA; Guiroy A; Marré B; Joaquim A; Yurac R
    World Neurosurg; 2022 May; 161():e436-e440. PubMed ID: 35158101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of intra- and interobserver reliability of the AO classification for wrist fractures.
    Tenório PHM; Vieira MM; Alberti A; Abreu MFM; Nakamoto JC; Cliquet A
    Rev Bras Ortop; 2018; 53(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 30377603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.
    Wood KB; Khanna G; Vaccaro AR; Arnold PM; Harris MB; Mehbod AA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1423-9. PubMed ID: 15995107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AO and the Tronzo classification systems of fractures of the trochanteric area.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Besa P; Zamora M; Schweitzer D; Klaber I
    Injury; 2015; 46(6):1054-8. PubMed ID: 25818057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries classification systems exhibit lower inter- and intra-observer agreement than other fractures classifications?: A comparison using fractures of the trochanteric area of the proximal femur as contrast model.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Klaber I; Carmona M; Palma J; Campos M; Yurac R
    Injury; 2016 Apr; 47(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 26653269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.