310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30259217)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hoshino N; Murakami K; Hida K; Sakamoto T; Sakai Y
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jan; 24(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 30259217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating local lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging, endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Li XT; Sun YS; Tang L; Cao K; Zhang XY
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Jun; 17(6):O129-35. PubMed ID: 25628186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of Lateral Pelvic Lymph-Node Metastasis in Low Rectal Cancer by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Ishibe A; Ota M; Watanabe J; Suwa Y; Suzuki S; Kanazawa A; Watanabe K; Ichikawa Y; Kunisaki C; Endo I
World J Surg; 2016 Apr; 40(4):995-1001. PubMed ID: 26541864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endorectal ultrasonography for detecting lymph node involvement in patients with rectal cancer: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.
Wang X; Gao Y; Li J; Wu J; Wang B; Ma X; Tian J; Shen M; Wang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(43):e12899. PubMed ID: 30412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Assessment of lymph node status in rectal cancer by imaging].
Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 19(6):630-3. PubMed ID: 27353097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlations between the sizes of lateral pelvic lymph nodes and metastases in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Nozawa H
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Dec; 88(12):1306-1310. PubMed ID: 29974631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Restaging of Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Wei MZ; Zhao ZH; Wang JY
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 31939890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial intelligence for pre-operative lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Seow W; Vather R; Carneiro G; Moore JW; Sammour T
BMC Cancer; 2021 Sep; 21(1):1058. PubMed ID: 34565338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The value of four imaging modalities in diagnosing lymph node involvement in rectal cancer: an overview and adjusted indirect comparison.
Gao Y; Li J; Ma X; Wang J; Wang B; Tian J; Chen G
Clin Exp Med; 2019 May; 19(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 30900099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feasibility of Selective Lateral Node Dissection Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.
Park BK; Lee SJ; Hur BY; Kim MJ; Chan Park S; Chang HJ; Kim DY; Oh JH
J Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 232():227-233. PubMed ID: 30463722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Al-Sukhni E; Milot L; Fruitman M; Beyene J; Victor JC; Schmocker S; Brown G; McLeod R; Kennedy E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2212-23. PubMed ID: 22271205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Kiyomatsu T; Hata K; Nozawa H; Morikawa T; Watanabe T
Tech Coloproctol; 2018 May; 22(5):347-354. PubMed ID: 29623475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency for local recurrence of rectal cancer using CT, MRI, PET and PET-CT: A systematic review protocol.
Shao H; Ma X; Gao Y; Wang J; Wu J; Wang B; Li J; Tian J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e12900. PubMed ID: 30508883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A logistic model including risk factors for lymph node metastasis can improve the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of rectal cancer.
Ogawa S; Itabashi M; Hirosawa T; Hashimoto T; Bamba Y; Kameoka S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(2):707-12. PubMed ID: 25684512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of multidetector row computed tomography for assessment of lymph node metastasis in patients with distal rectal cancer.
Kobayashi H; Kikuchi A; Okazaki S; Ishiguro M; Ishikawa T; Iida S; Uetake H; Sugihara K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 25124470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal diagnostic criteria for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in rectal carcinoma.
Matsuoka H; Nakamura A; Masaki T; Sugiyama M; Nitatori T; Ohkura Y; Sakamoto A; Atomi Y
Anticancer Res; 2007; 27(5B):3529-33. PubMed ID: 17972513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
Akasu T; Iinuma G; Takawa M; Yamamoto S; Muramatsu Y; Moriyama N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):2787-94. PubMed ID: 19618244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.
Bipat S; Glas AS; Slors FJ; Zwinderman AH; Bossuyt PM; Stoker J
Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):773-83. PubMed ID: 15273331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The important risk factor for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis of lower rectal cancer is node-positive status on magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Lymph Node Committee of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.
Ogawa S; Hida J; Ike H; Kinugasa T; Ota M; Shinto E; Itabashi M; Okamoto T; Sugihara K
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1719-28. PubMed ID: 27576475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
