These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30259224)

  • 21. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants.
    Cochran DL; Buser D; ten Bruggenkate CM; Weingart D; Taylor TM; Bernard JP; Peters F; Simpson JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Apr; 13(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 11952734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Removal torque and physico-chemical characteristics of dental implants etched with hydrofluoric and nitric acid. An experimental study in Beagle dogs.
    Martínez-González JM; García-Sabán F; Ferrándiz-Bernal J; Gonzalo-Lafuente JC; Cano-Sánchez J; Barona-Dorado C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2006 May; 11(3):E281-5. PubMed ID: 16648769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution.
    Stadlinger B; Ferguson SJ; Eckelt U; Mai R; Lode AT; Loukota R; Schlottig F
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21177005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Removal Torques for Implants With Hydroxyapatite-Blasted and Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surfaces.
    Sohn SH; Cho SA
    Implant Dent; 2016 Oct; 25(5):581-7. PubMed ID: 27540839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants.
    Li D; Ferguson SJ; Beutler T; Cochran DL; Sittig C; Hirt HP; Buser D
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 May; 60(2):325-32. PubMed ID: 11857440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis In Vivo of Bone Modulation in Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Titanium Implant Surfaces.
    Ferreira JA; Sartori EM; Piola Rizzante FA; Siqueira R; Silveira Mendonça DB; de Magalhães D; Mendonça G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(4):650-659. PubMed ID: 34411204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
    Coelho PG; Bonfante EA; Pessoa RS; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Witek L; Suzuki M
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modulation of osteoclastogenesis by macrogeometrically designed hydrophilic dual acid-etched titanium surfaces.
    Jesus RNR; Tsatsanis C; Moura CCG; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Stavropoulos A
    Braz Oral Res; 2024; 38():e064. PubMed ID: 39016370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hydrophilic surface of Ti6Al4V-ELI alloy improves the early bone apposition of sheep tibia.
    Sartoretto SC; Alves ATNN; Zarranz L; Jorge MZ; Granjeiro JM; Calasans-Maia MD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Aug; 28(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 27317626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
    Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Photo-activated implants: a triple-blinded, split-mouth, randomized controlled clinical trial on the resistance to removal torque at various healing intervals.
    Puisys A; Schlee M; Linkevicius T; Petrakakis P; Tjaden A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1789-1799. PubMed ID: 31512072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
    Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of osseointegration on various implant surfaces after bacterial contamination and cleaning: a rabbit study.
    Yuan K; Chan YJ; Kung KC; Lee TM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 24451851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical and histologic evaluation of non-washed resorbable blasting media and alumina-blasted/acid-etched surfaces.
    Coelho PG; Marin C; Granato R; Giro G; Suzuki M; Bonfante EA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 21435012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
    Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Histologic Analyses of Immediate Implant Placement in Infected and Noninfected Sockets: An Experimental Pilot Study in Beagle Dogs.
    Lee J; Kim S; Koo KT; Seol YJ; Cho HJ; Lee YM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):575–584. PubMed ID: 30807624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study.
    Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces.
    Yadav S; Upadhyay M; Roberts WE
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 25681126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early Healing Evaluation of Commercially Pure Titanium and Ti-6Al-4V Presenting Similar Surface Texture: An In Vivo Study.
    Castellano A; Gil LF; Bonfante EA; Tovar N; Neiva R; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    Implant Dent; 2017 Jun; 26(3):338-344. PubMed ID: 28406881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.