These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30259597)

  • 1. Spatial parcellations, spectral filtering, and connectivity measures in fMRI: Optimizing for discrimination.
    Sala-Llonch R; Smith SM; Woolrich M; Duff EP
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Feb; 40(2):407-419. PubMed ID: 30259597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in resting state fMRI.
    Zhang C; Baum SA; Adduru VR; Biswal BB; Michael AM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():907-918. PubMed ID: 30120987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.
    Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Choe AS; Pekar JJ; Caffo BS; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():478-491. PubMed ID: 29391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using connectomics for predictive assessment of brain parcellations.
    Albers KJ; Ambrosen KS; Liptrot MG; Dyrby TB; Schmidt MN; Mørup M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118170. PubMed ID: 34087365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial covariance based functional connectivity computation using Ledoit-Wolf covariance regularization.
    Brier MR; Mitra A; McCarthy JE; Ances BM; Snyder AZ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():29-38. PubMed ID: 26208872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing Connectivity-Driven Brain Parcellation Using Ensemble Clustering.
    Kurmukov A; Mussabaeva A; Denisova Y; Moyer D; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Gutman BA
    Brain Connect; 2020 May; 10(4):183-194. PubMed ID: 32264696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural Basis of Large-Scale Functional Connectivity in the Mouse.
    Grandjean J; Zerbi V; Balsters JH; Wenderoth N; Rudin M
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(34):8092-8101. PubMed ID: 28716961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets.
    Yoo K; Rosenberg MD; Hsu WT; Zhang S; Li CR; Scheinost D; Constable RT; Chun MM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 167():11-22. PubMed ID: 29122720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive cortical parcellations for source reconstructed EEG/MEG connectomes.
    Farahibozorg SR; Henson RN; Hauk O
    Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 169():23-45. PubMed ID: 28893608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex and Age Effects of Functional Connectivity in Early Adulthood.
    Zhang C; Cahill ND; Arbabshirani MR; White T; Baum SA; Michael AM
    Brain Connect; 2016 Nov; 6(9):700-713. PubMed ID: 27527561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Typicality of functional connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases, and preprocessing pipelines.
    Kopal J; Pidnebesna A; Tomeček D; Tintěra J; Hlinka J
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Dec; 41(18):5325-5340. PubMed ID: 32881215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data.
    Glasser MF; Coalson TS; Bijsterbosch JD; Harrison SJ; Harms MP; Anticevic A; Van Essen DC; Smith SM
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():692-717. PubMed ID: 29753843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hybrid high-resolution anatomical MRI atlas with sub-parcellation of cortical gyri using resting fMRI.
    Joshi AA; Choi S; Liu Y; Chong M; Sonkar G; Gonzalez-Martinez J; Nair D; Wisnowski JL; Haldar JP; Shattuck DW; Damasio H; Leahy RM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2022 May; 374():109566. PubMed ID: 35306036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Revisiting the Functional and Structural Connectivity of Large-Scale Cortical Networks.
    Lee TW; Xue SW
    Brain Connect; 2018 Apr; 8(3):129-138. PubMed ID: 29291634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpreting temporal fluctuations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI.
    Liégeois R; Laumann TO; Snyder AZ; Zhou J; Yeo BTT
    Neuroimage; 2017 Dec; 163():437-455. PubMed ID: 28916180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tradeoffs in pushing the spatial resolution of fMRI for the 7T Human Connectome Project.
    T Vu A; Jamison K; Glasser MF; Smith SM; Coalson T; Moeller S; Auerbach EJ; Uğurbil K; Yacoub E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jul; 154():23-32. PubMed ID: 27894889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relationship between instantaneous phase synchrony and correlation-based sliding windows for time-resolved fMRI connectivity analysis.
    Pedersen M; Omidvarnia A; Zalesky A; Jackson GD
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():85-94. PubMed ID: 29890326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity methods.
    Choe AS; Nebel MB; Barber AD; Cohen JR; Xu Y; Pekar JJ; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
    Neuroimage; 2017 Sep; 158():155-175. PubMed ID: 28687517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson's correlation coefficient under autocorrelation.
    Afyouni S; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():609-625. PubMed ID: 31158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation and calibration of functional network modeling methods based on known anatomical connections.
    Dawson DA; Cha K; Lewis LB; Mendola JD; Shmuel A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 67():331-43. PubMed ID: 23153969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.