173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3026005)
1. A randomized, double-blind comparison of sulbactam/ampicillin and clindamycin for the treatment of aerobic and aerobic-anaerobic infections.
Reinhardt JF; Johnston L; Ruane P; Johnson CC; Ingram-drake L; MacDonald K; Ward KW; Mathisen G; George WL; Finegold SM
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S569-75. PubMed ID: 3026005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized controlled trial of ampicillin plus sulbactam vs. gentamicin plus clindamycin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a preliminary report. Study Group of Intraabdominal Infections.
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S583-8. PubMed ID: 2879345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of sulbactam plus ampicillin in gynecologic infections.
Giamarellou H; Trouvas G; Avlami A; Aravantinos D; Daikos GK
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S579-82. PubMed ID: 3026007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus metronidazole-gentamicin in the treatment of soft tissue pelvic infections.
Crombleholme WR; Ohm-Smith M; Robbie MO; DeKay V; Sweet RL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):507-12. PubMed ID: 3030109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical study of Sulbactam and ampicillin and clindamycin and tobramycin in infections of soft tissues.
Stromberg BV; Reines HD; Hunt P
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1986 Jun; 162(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 3012808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of parenteral sulbactam/ampicillin versus clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease.
Gunning J
Drugs; 1986; 31 Suppl 2():14-7. PubMed ID: 3013567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of Pseudomonas species in patients treated with ampicillin and Sulbactam for gangrenous and perforated appendicitis.
Yellin AE; Heseltine PN; Berne TV; Appleman MD; Gill MA; Riggio CE; Chenella FC
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Oct; 161(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 2996161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sulbactam/ampicillin versus metronidazole/gentamicin in the treatment of severe pelvic infections.
Crombleholme W; Landers D; Ohm-Smith M; Robbie MO; Hadley WK; DeKay V; Dahrouge D; Sweet RL
Drugs; 1986; 31 Suppl 2():11-3. PubMed ID: 3013566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of ampicillin plus sulbactam versus clindamycin and gentamicin for treatment of postpartum infection.
McGregor JA; Christensen FB
Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 2():35-9. PubMed ID: 2803579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro efficacy of sulbactam combined with ampicillin against anaerobic bacteria.
Wexler HM; Harris B; Carter WT; Finegold SM
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1985 May; 27(5):876-8. PubMed ID: 2990330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical efficacy of sulbactam/ampicillin in pediatric infections caused by ampicillin-resistant or penicillin-resistant organisms.
Syriopoulou V; Bitsi M; Theodoridis C; Saroglou I; Krikos X; Tzanetou K
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S630-3. PubMed ID: 3026016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ampicillin/sulbactam vs. clindamycin/gentamicin in the treatment of postpartum endometritis.
Gall S; Koukol DH
J Reprod Med; 1996 Aug; 41(8):575-80. PubMed ID: 8866384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sulbactam plus ampicillin: interim review of efficacy and safety for therapeutic and prophylactic use.
Lees L; Milson JA; Knirsch AK; Greenhalgh K
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S644-50. PubMed ID: 3026019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An open, comparative study of sulbactam plus ampicillin vs. cefotaxime as initial therapy for serious soft tissue and bone and joint infections.
Löffler L; Bauernfeind A; Keyl W; Hoffstedt B; Piergies A; Lenz W
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S593-8. PubMed ID: 3026009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sulbactam/ampicillin: in vitro spectrum, potency, and activity in models of acute infection.
Retsema JA; English AR; Girard A; Lynch JE; Anderson M; Brennan L; Cimochowski C; Faiella J; Norcia W; Sawyer P
Rev Infect Dis; 1986; 8 Suppl 5():S528-34. PubMed ID: 3026001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clindamycin and gentamicin for aerobic and anaerobic sepsis.
Fass RJ; Ruiz DE; Gardner WG; Rotilie CA
Arch Intern Med; 1977 Jan; 137(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 318824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical efficacy and safety of sulbactam/ampicillin in patients suffering from chronic liver disease.
Galante D; Esposito S; Barba D; Ruffilli MP
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1987 Apr; 19(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 3034850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sulbactam/ampicillin for treatment of polymicrobial pelvic infections.
Hemsell DL
Drugs; 1986; 31 Suppl 2():22-5. PubMed ID: 3013569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cefoperazone plus sulbactam with clindamycin plus gentamicin as treatment for intra-abdominal infections.
Greenberg RN; Cayavec P; Danko LS; Bowen K; Montazemi R; Kearney PA; Johnson SB; Strodel WE
J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 Sep; 34(3):391-401. PubMed ID: 7829413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of ampicillin-sulbactam to cefoxitin and doxycycline or clindamycin and gentamicin in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease or endometritis.
McGregor JA; Crombleholme WR; Newton E; Sweet RL; Tuomala R; Gibbs RS
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 83(6):998-1004. PubMed ID: 8190448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
