These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30260989)

  • 1. Revisiting GUD: An empirical test of the size-dependency of patch departure behaviour.
    Cozzoli F; Ligetta G; Vignes F; Basset A
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204448. PubMed ID: 30260989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size dependency of patch departure behavior: evidence from granivorous rodents.
    Cozzoli F; Gjoni V; Basset A
    Ecology; 2019 Oct; 100(10):e02800. PubMed ID: 31233618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The size dependency of foraging behaviour: an empirical test performed on aquatic amphipods.
    Cozzoli F; Shokri M; Boulamail S; Marrocco V; Vignes F; Basset A
    Oecologia; 2022 Jun; 199(2):377-386. PubMed ID: 35678931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do foragers decide when to leave a patch? A test of alternative models under natural and experimental conditions.
    Marshall HH; Carter AJ; Ashford A; Rowcliffe JM; Cowlishaw G
    J Anim Ecol; 2013 Jul; 82(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 23650999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Among-individual differences in foraging modulate resource exploitation under perceived predation risk.
    Eccard JA; Liesenjohann T; Dammhahn M
    Oecologia; 2020 Dec; 194(4):621-634. PubMed ID: 33141325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach to assessing the space use behavior of macroinvertebrates by automated video tracking.
    Shokri M; Cozzoli F; Ciotti M; Gjoni V; Marrocco V; Vignes F; Basset A
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Apr; 11(7):3004-3014. PubMed ID: 33841762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal movement strategies for social foragers in unpredictable environments.
    Hancock PA; Milner-Gulland EJ
    Ecology; 2006 Aug; 87(8):2094-102. PubMed ID: 16937648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking patch-use behavior, resource density, and growth expectations in fish.
    Persson A; Stenberg M
    Ecology; 2006 Aug; 87(8):1953-9. PubMed ID: 16937633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of facilitation and competition on group foraging in patches.
    Laguë M; Tania N; Heath J; Edelstein-Keshet L
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Oct; 310():88-96. PubMed ID: 22743132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial aggregation and association in different resource-patch distributions: experimental analysis with Drosophila.
    Takahashi KH
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):266-73. PubMed ID: 16903064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition in a group of equal foragers.
    Rita H; Ranta E
    Am Nat; 1998 Jul; 152(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 18811402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups.
    Livoreil B; Giraldeau La
    Anim Behav; 1997 Oct; 54(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 9344448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The top-down mechanism for body-mass-abundance scaling.
    Rossberg AG; Ishii R; Amemiya T; Itoh K
    Ecology; 2008 Feb; 89(2):567-80. PubMed ID: 18409445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Harvest rates and foraging strategy of Carollia perspicillata (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in an artificial food patch.
    Bernal-Páez C; Sánchez F
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():396-401. PubMed ID: 30036641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skuas at penguin carcass: patch use and state-dependent leaving decisions in a top-predator.
    Hahn S; Peter HU; Bauer S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 272(1571):1449-54. PubMed ID: 16011919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grazers and Diggers: Exploitation Competition and Coexistence among Foragers with Different Feeding Strategies on a Single Resource.
    Richards SA; Nisbet RM; Wilson WG; Possingham HP
    Am Nat; 2000 Feb; 155(2):266-279. PubMed ID: 10686165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncertainty drives deviations in normative foraging decision strategies.
    Kilpatrick ZP; Davidson JD; El Hady A
    J R Soc Interface; 2021 Jul; 18(180):20210337. PubMed ID: 34255987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The interaction between the spatial distribution of resource patches and population density: consequences for intraspecific growth and morphology.
    Jacobson B; Grant JW; Peres-Neto PR
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 25757660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patch leaving rules: a stochastic version of a well-known deterministic motivational model.
    Pierre JS; Masson JP; Wajnberg E
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Nov; 313():1-11. PubMed ID: 22906591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch exploitation in two dimensions: from Daphnia to simulated foragers.
    Dees ND; Bahar S; Garcia R; Moss F
    J Theor Biol; 2008 May; 252(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18343411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.