These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30263019)

  • 1. Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.
    Vaiserman A; Koliada A; Zabuga O; Socol Y
    Dose Response; 2018; 16(3):1559325818796331. PubMed ID: 30263019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.
    Socol Y; Dobrzyński L; Doss M; Feinendegen LE; Janiak MK; Miller ML; Sanders CL; Scott BR; Ulsh B; Vaiserman A
    Dose Response; 2014 May; 12(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 24910586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
    Doss M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model.
    Sutou S
    Genes Environ; 2020; 42():1. PubMed ID: 31908690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.
    Cardarelli JJ; Ulsh BA
    Dose Response; 2018; 16(3):1559325818779651. PubMed ID: 30013457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The challenges of defining hormesis in epidemiological studies: The case of radiation hormesis.
    Iavicoli I; Fontana L; Santocono C; Guarino D; Laudiero M; Calabrese EJ
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166030. PubMed ID: 37544458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals.
    Sutou S
    Genes Environ; 2018; 40():26. PubMed ID: 30598710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.
    Vaiserman AM
    Dose Response; 2010 Jan; 8(2):172-91. PubMed ID: 20585444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Dose Response; 2015; 13(4):1559325815621764. PubMed ID: 26740815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A brief review of radiation hormesis.
    Jolly D; Meyer J
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2009 Dec; 32(4):180-7. PubMed ID: 20169836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Until There Is a Resolution of the Pro-LNT/Anti-LNT Debate, We Should Head Toward a More Sensible Graded Approach for Protection From Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation.
    Sykes PJ
    Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820921651. PubMed ID: 32425725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].
    Sutou S
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(11):1197-211. PubMed ID: 26521869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm.
    Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE
    J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A critical evaluation of the NCRP COMMENTARY 27 endorsement of the linear no-threshold model of radiation effects.
    Ulsh BA
    Environ Res; 2018 Nov; 167():472-487. PubMed ID: 30138826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
    Calabrese EJ
    Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.