These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30263858)

  • 21. Does manual anaesthetic record capture remove clinically important data?
    van Schalkwyk JM; Lowes D; Frampton C; Merry AF
    Br J Anaesth; 2011 Oct; 107(4):546-52. PubMed ID: 21665898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) improves operation note documentation: the results of a closed loop audit and proposal of a team-based approach to documentation.
    Aldoori J; Drye N; Peter M; Barrie J
    BMJ Open Qual; 2019; 8(4):e000766. PubMed ID: 31909211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the Correct Documentation of Time and Physician Information on Medical Records in the Emergency Department of Queen's Hospital: An Audit and Re-audit.
    Gkiala A
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e33000. PubMed ID: 36712708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Priorities for peri-operative research in Africa.
    Biccard BM;
    Anaesthesia; 2020 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():e28-e33. PubMed ID: 31903576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perioperative anesthetic documentation: Adherence to current Australian guidelines.
    Elhalawani I; Jenkins S; Newman N
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2013 Apr; 29(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 23878444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A retrospective single-site data-linkage study comparing manual to electronic data abstraction for routine post-operative nausea and vomiting audit.
    Miller M; Strazdins E; Young S; Kalish N; Congreve K
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Aug; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 34363667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multimodal system designed to reduce errors in recording and administration of drugs in anaesthesia: prospective randomised clinical evaluation.
    Merry AF; Webster CS; Hannam J; Mitchell SJ; Henderson R; Reid P; Edwards KE; Jardim A; Pak N; Cooper J; Hopley L; Frampton C; Short TG
    BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d5543. PubMed ID: 21940742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of Multimodal Intervention Strategies in Improving Perioperative Documentation at a Rural Tertiary Care Centre.
    George M; Menon GD; Vergis S
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2020 Dec; 48(6):473-476. PubMed ID: 33313586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improving the quality of operation notes: Effect of using proforma, audit and education sessions.
    Bozbiyik O; Makay O; Ozdemir M; Goktepe B; Ersin S
    Asian J Surg; 2020 Jul; 43(7):755-758. PubMed ID: 31653554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines as the gold standard.
    Shayah A; Agada FO; Gunasekaran S; Jassar P; England RJ
    Int J Clin Pract; 2007 Apr; 61(4):677-9. PubMed ID: 17394439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing the Quality of Orthopaedic Operation Notes in Accordance With the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: An Audit Cycle.
    Mustafa MKE; Khairy AMM; Ahmed ABE
    Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9707. PubMed ID: 32821626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving documentation in surgical operation notes.
    Parwaiz H; Perera R; Creamer J; Macdonald H; Hunter I
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2017 Feb; 78(2):104-107. PubMed ID: 28165791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving the quality of general surgical operation notes in accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines: a prospective completed audit loop study.
    Singh R; Chauhan R; Anwar S
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Jun; 18(3):578-80. PubMed ID: 21210903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Issues surrounding record keeping in district nursing practice.
    Anderson EE
    Br J Community Nurs; 2000 Jul; 5(7):352-6. PubMed ID: 12271225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Real-time pulse oximetry artifact annotation on computerized anaesthetic records.
    Gostt RK; Rathbone GD; Tucker AP
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2002; 17(3-4):249-57. PubMed ID: 12455744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of an electronic health record audit used in a chiropractic teaching clinic system: an observational study.
    Injeyan HS; Hogg-Johnson S; Abdulla S; Chow N; Cox J; Ridding A; Jacobs C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jul; 21(1):750. PubMed ID: 34320964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving the quality of nursing documentation at a residential care home: a clinical audit.
    Moldskred PS; Snibsøer AK; Espehaug B
    BMC Nurs; 2021 Jun; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 34154606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluating the appropriateness of red blood cell transfusions: the limitations of retrospective medical record reviews.
    Audet AM; Goodnough LT; Parvin CA
    Int J Qual Health Care; 1996 Feb; 8(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 8680816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of electronic and handwritten anaesthetic records for completeness of information.
    Wrightson WA
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 Nov; 38(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 21226437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Factors affecting completeness of anaesthetic record: a cross-sectional study.
    Limpoon S; Seangrung R; Nimmankiatkul A
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2023 Nov; 85(11):5433-5438. PubMed ID: 37915645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.