113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30263875)
1. Efficacy of Concentrated Surfactant-Based Wound Dressings in Wound Repair and Biofilm Reduction.
Salisbury AM; Mayer D; Chen R; Percival SL
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2018 Sep; 7(9):315-322. PubMed ID: 30263875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of a surfactant-based wound dressing on biofilm control.
Percival SL; Mayer D; Salisbury AM
Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Sep; 25(5):767-773. PubMed ID: 28857343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Poloxamer-Based Wound Dressings on
Salisbury AM; Mullin M; Chen R; Percival SL
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2019 Oct; 8(10):463-468. PubMed ID: 31456903
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of a Surfactant-Based Wound Dressing in the Prevention of Biofilms.
Salisbury AM; Percival SL
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2018 Nov; 31(11):514-520. PubMed ID: 30335643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro cellular viability studies on a concentrated surfactant-based wound dressing.
Chen R; Salisbury AM; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2019 Jun; 16(3):703-712. PubMed ID: 30895731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION ANTIMICROBIAL WOUND DRESSING.
Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler IP
Acta Med Croatica; 2016 Mar; 70(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 27220190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model.
Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ
Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Stuermer EK; Plattfaut I; Dietrich M; Brill F; Kampe A; Wiencke V; Ulatowski A; Geffken M; Rembe JD; Naumova EA; Debus SE; Smeets R
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():664030. PubMed ID: 34054768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of two silver-containing wound dressings on burn wound isolates.
Thomas JG; Slone W; Linton S; Corum L; Percival SL
J Wound Care; 2011 Dec; 20(12):580-2, 584-6. PubMed ID: 22240884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of a novel, antimicrobial dressing on in vivo, Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound biofilm: quantitative comparative analysis using a rabbit ear model.
Seth AK; Zhong A; Nguyen KT; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA
Wound Repair Regen; 2014; 22(6):712-9. PubMed ID: 25230854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An in vitro test of the efficacy of an anti-biofilm wound dressing.
Said J; Walker M; Parsons D; Stapleton P; Beezer AE; Gaisford S
Int J Pharm; 2014 Oct; 474(1-2):177-81. PubMed ID: 25151435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A surfactant polymer dressing potentiates antimicrobial efficacy in biofilm disruption.
Das Ghatak P; Mathew-Steiner SS; Pandey P; Roy S; Sen CK
Sci Rep; 2018 Jan; 8(1):873. PubMed ID: 29343818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imparting commercial antimicrobial dressings with low-adherence to burn wounds.
Asghari S; Logsetty S; Liu S
Burns; 2016 Jun; 42(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 26847614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Efficacy of Tetrasodium EDTA on Biofilms.
Percival SL; Salisbury AM
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1057():101-110. PubMed ID: 29280095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative study on the cellular viability and debridement efficiency of antimicrobial-based wound dressings.
Chen R; Salisbury AM; Percival SL
Int Wound J; 2020 Feb; 17(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 31657125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical investigation of biofilm in non-healing wounds by high resolution microscopy techniques.
Hurlow J; Blanz E; Gaddy JA
J Wound Care; 2016 Sep; 25 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S11-22. PubMed ID: 27608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Containing Silver Sulfadiazine With High Biocompatibility: In Vitro Study.
Mohseni M; Shamloo A; Aghababaei Z; Vossoughi M; Moravvej H
Artif Organs; 2016 Aug; 40(8):765-73. PubMed ID: 27094090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of flow cytometry to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of silver-containing wound dressings against planktonic Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Percival SL; Slone W; Linton S; Okel T; Corum L; Thomas JG
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):436-41. PubMed ID: 21518089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydroconductive and silver-impregnated foam dressings: a comparison.
Alkhalil A; Day A; Monger KW; Zhang J; Carney BC; Hoffman HN; Moffatt LT; Shupp JW
J Wound Care; 2017 Jul; 26(Sup7):S15-S22. PubMed ID: 28704172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial activity of a bioelectric dressing using an in vitro wound pathogen colony drip-flow reactor biofilm model.
Kim H; Izadjoo M
J Wound Care; 2016 Jul; 25(Sup7):S47-S52. PubMed ID: 29027847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
