These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30264183)

  • 1. Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):963-990. PubMed ID: 30264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining item response theory and diagnostic classification models: a psychometric model for scaling ability and diagnosing misconceptions.
    Bradshaw L; Templin J
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jul; 79(3):403-25. PubMed ID: 25205005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Growth Modeling in a Diagnostic Classification Model (DCM) Framework-A Multivariate Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Pan Q; Qin L; Kingston N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1714. PubMed ID: 32903674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general proof of consistency of heuristic classification for cognitive diagnosis models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Nov; 68(3):387-409. PubMed ID: 25872467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.
    Chen Y; Li X; Liu J; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):538-562. PubMed ID: 29532405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Wang T; Strobl C; Zeileis A; Merkle EC
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):132-155. PubMed ID: 29150815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 30725333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive Diagnosis for Small Educational Programs: The General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Sun Y; Bian Y
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):355-375. PubMed ID: 29150816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF; Zheng Y; Henson R
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):1069-1092. PubMed ID: 27734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal measurement invariance and explanatory IRT models for adolescents' oral health-related quality of life.
    Yau DTW; Wong MCM; Lam KF; McGrath C
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Apr; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 29642916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Q-Matrix Designs of Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Models With Hierarchical Attributes for Formative Assessment.
    Tian W; Zhang J; Peng Q; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1694. PubMed ID: 32903650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.