214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30264386)
1. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oncologic and Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic, Open, and Robotic Approaches for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Multicenter, Propensity Score-Weighted Cohort Study.
Kethman WC; Harris AHS; Morris AM; Shelton A; Kirilcuk N; Kin C
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jan; 63(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 31764247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database.
Simon HL; de Paula TR; Profeta da Luz MM; Kiran RP; Keller DS
Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Sep; 64(9):1096-1105. PubMed ID: 33951688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the role of robotic proctectomy in obese patients: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.
Glencer AC; Lin JA; Trang K; Greenberg A; Kirkwood KS; Adam MA; Sarin A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 35147841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):757-763. PubMed ID: 30014329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: results from the ACS NSQIP.
Greenblatt DY; Rajamanickam V; Pugely AJ; Heise CP; Foley EF; Kennedy GD
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 May; 212(5):844-54. PubMed ID: 21414814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group
Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep; 20 Suppl 6():33-46. PubMed ID: 30255642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) versus laparoscopic TME for MRI-defined low rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcomes.
Roodbeen SX; Penna M; Mackenzie H; Kusters M; Slater A; Jones OM; Lindsey I; Guy RJ; Cunningham C; Hompes R
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2459-2467. PubMed ID: 30350103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.
Crolla RMPH; Mulder PG; van der Schelling GP
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4562-4570. PubMed ID: 29761276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
