These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30264907)

  • 1. Effect of titanium surface functionalization with bioactive glass on osseointegration: An experimental study in dogs.
    Soares PBF; Moura CCG; Chinaglia CR; Zanotto ED; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Stavropoulos A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1120-1125. PubMed ID: 30264907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Implant Surfaces on Osseointegration: A Histomorphometric and Implant Stability Study in Rabbits.
    Soares PB; Moura CC; Claudino M; Carvalho VF; Rocha FS; Zanetta-Barbosa D
    Braz Dent J; 2015 Oct; 26(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 26647927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
    Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.
    Gottlow J; Barkarmo S; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e204-12. PubMed ID: 22487460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Schätzle M; Männchen R; Balbach U; Hämmerle CH; Toutenburg H; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
    Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone tissue response to implant surfaces functionalized with phosphate-containing polymers.
    Cardoso MV; Chaudhari A; Yoshida Y; Van Meerbeek B; Naert I; Duyck J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 23039076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
    Lee JT; Cho SA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Thermal oxidation and hydrofluoric acid treatment on the sandblasted implant surface: A histologic histomorphometric and biomechanical study.
    Qamheya AHA; Arısan V; Mutlu Z; Karabaglı M; Soluk Tekkeşin M; Kara K; Erol A; Ersanlı S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jul; 29(7):741-755. PubMed ID: 29876965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of a Novel Surface of Bioactive Implants on Osseointegration: A Comparative and Histomorfometric Correlation and Implant Stability Study in Minipigs.
    Romero-Ruiz MM; Gil-Mur FJ; Ríos-Santos JV; Lázaro-Calvo P; Ríos-Carrasco B; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 May; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 31075984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative in vivo study of alloy titanium implants with two different surfaces: biomechanical and SEM analysis.
    Souza FÁ; Furtado TSM; Dayube URC; Melo WM; Nishioka RS; Poli PP; Maiorana C; de Carvalho PSP
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4383-4397. PubMed ID: 30972600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of local cancellous bone amelioration by poly-L-DL-lactide copolymers to improve primary stability of dental implants: a biomechanical study in sheep.
    Stübinger S; Waser J; Hefti T; Drechsler A; Sidler M; Klein K; von Rechenberg B; Schlottig F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 May; 26(5):572-80. PubMed ID: 24989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of hydrothermal spark discharge anodization in the early integration of implants in sheep sinuses.
    Duncan WJ; Gay JH; Lee MH; Bae TS; Lee SJ; Loch C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):975-80. PubMed ID: 26798978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of modifications of dual acid-etched implant surfaces on peri-implant bone formation. Part I: organic coatings.
    Schliephake H; Aref A; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Sewing A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 19126105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid-etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs.
    de Jesus RNR; Stavropoulos A; Oliveira MTF; Soares PBF; Moura CCG; Zanetta-Barbosa D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 27006317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roughness and wettability effect on histological and mechanical response of self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Espinar-Escalona E; Bravo-Gonzalez LA; Pegueroles M; Gil FJ
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):1115-20. PubMed ID: 26955833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The comparison between implant stability quotient and bone-implant contact revisited: an experiment in Beagle dog.
    Manresa C; Bosch M; Echeverría JJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Nov; 25(11):1213-1221. PubMed ID: 24102812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of stability changes of various palatal implants.
    Jayaprakash PK; Basavanna JM; Thakur RPS; Kannan S; Singh NR; Kalra H
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2020 Jan; 9(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 32110569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.