These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30265715)

  • 41. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Disentangling decoupling: comment on Smallwood (2013).
    Franklin MS; Mrazek MD; Broadway JM; Schooler JW
    Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 139(3):536-541. PubMed ID: 23607431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of array structure and secondary cognitive task demand on processes of visual search.
    Savage SW; Potter DD; Tatler BW
    Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():37-46. PubMed ID: 30248367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Capture and Control: Working Memory Modulates Attentional Capture by Reward-Related Stimuli.
    Watson P; Pearson D; Chow M; Theeuwes J; Wiers RW; Most SB; Le Pelley ME
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1174-1185. PubMed ID: 31268837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How task demands influence scanpath similarity in a sequential number-search task.
    Dewhurst R; Foulsham T; Jarodzka H; Johansson R; Holmqvist K; Nyström M
    Vision Res; 2018 Aug; 149():9-23. PubMed ID: 29857021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Distractibility is a function of engagement, not task difficulty: Evidence from a new oculomotor capture paradigm.
    Buetti S; Lleras A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1382-1405. PubMed ID: 27690512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Balancing energetic and cognitive resources: memory use during search depends on the orienting effector.
    Solman GJ; Kingstone A
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):443-54. PubMed ID: 24946208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Visual search in unilateral spatial neglect: The effects of distractors on a dynamic visual search task.
    Emerson RL; García-Molina A; López Carballo J; García Fernández J; Aparicio-López C; Novo J; Sánchez-Carrión R; Enseñat-Cantallops A; Peña-Casanova J
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2019; 26(5):401-410. PubMed ID: 29469619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The association between visual attention and arithmetic competence: The mediating role of enumeration.
    Wong TT; Liu D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Aug; 196():104864. PubMed ID: 32344115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How Reliably Do Eye Parameters Indicate Internal Versus External Attentional Focus?
    Annerer-Walcher S; Ceh SM; Putze F; Kampen M; Körner C; Benedek M
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12977. PubMed ID: 33877694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():14-25. PubMed ID: 24793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neurophysiological indicators of internal attention: An electroencephalography-eye-tracking coregistration study.
    Ceh SM; Annerer-Walcher S; Körner C; Rominger C; Kober SE; Fink A; Benedek M
    Brain Behav; 2020 Oct; 10(10):e01790. PubMed ID: 32816400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distraction by salient stimuli in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for the role of task difficulty in bottom-up and top-down processing.
    Schneidt A; Jusyte A; Rauss K; Schönenberg M
    Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():206-220. PubMed ID: 29518704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Analogies solving by individuals with and without intellectual disability: Different cognitive patterns as indicated by eye movements.
    Vakil E; Lifshitz H; Tzuriel D; Weiss I; Arzuoan Y
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(2):846-56. PubMed ID: 21159489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Eye movements and problem solving: guiding attention guides thought.
    Grant ER; Spivey MJ
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 12930477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The costly filtering of potential distraction: evidence for a supramodal mechanism.
    Marini F; Chelazzi L; Maravita A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):906-22. PubMed ID: 22984954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link.
    Reichle ED; Pollatsek A; Rayner K
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):155-85. PubMed ID: 22229492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microsaccade-related brain potentials signal the focus of visuospatial attention.
    Meyberg S; Werkle-Bergner M; Sommer W; Dimigen O
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():79-88. PubMed ID: 25285375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes.
    Smith TJ; Mital PK
    J Vis; 2013 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 23863509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Eyeblinking during problem solving: the effect of problem difficulty and internally vs externally directed attention.
    Wood JG; Hassett J
    Psychophysiology; 1983 Jan; 20(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 6828607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.