These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30265767)

  • 1. Weak-harmonic regularization for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Langkammer C; Tejos C; Acosta-Cabronero J
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 30265767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preconditioned total field inversion (TFI) method for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu Z; Kee Y; Zhou D; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jul; 78(1):303-315. PubMed ID: 27464893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Single-step quantitative susceptibility mapping with variational penalties.
    Chatnuntawech I; McDaniel P; Cauley SF; Gagoski BA; Langkammer C; Martin A; Grant PE; Wald LL; Setsompop K; Adalsteinsson E; Bilgic B
    NMR Biomed; 2017 Apr; 30(4):. PubMed ID: 27332141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background field removal technique based on non-regularized variable kernels sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Kan H; Arai N; Takizawa M; Omori K; Kasai H; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():94-101. PubMed ID: 29902566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain.
    Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z
    J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction using annihilating filter-based low-rank Hankel matrix approach.
    Ahn HS; Park SH; Ye JC
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Mar; 83(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 31468595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast nonlinear susceptibility inversion with variational regularization.
    Milovic C; Bilgic B; Zhao B; Acosta-Cabronero J; Tejos C
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Aug; 80(2):814-821. PubMed ID: 29322560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Background field removal technique using regularization enabled sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data with varying kernel sizes.
    Kan H; Kasai H; Arai N; Kunitomo H; Hirose Y; Shibamoto Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):1026-33. PubMed ID: 27114339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the effect of oblique image acquisition on the accuracy of QSM and a robust tilt correction method.
    Kiersnowski OC; Karsa A; Wastling SJ; Thornton JS; Shmueli K
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 May; 89(5):1791-1808. PubMed ID: 36480002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear formulation of the magnetic field to source relationship for robust quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Liu T; Wisnieff C; Lou M; Chen W; Spincemaille P; Wang Y
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 Feb; 69(2):467-76. PubMed ID: 22488774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low rank alternating direction method of multipliers reconstruction for MR fingerprinting.
    Assländer J; Cloos MA; Knoll F; Sodickson DK; Hennig J; Lattanzi R
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jan; 79(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 28261851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity effects for fast quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Ngo GC; Bilgic B; Gagoski BA; Sutton BP
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Mar; 81(3):1645-1658. PubMed ID: 30387905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole head quantitative susceptibility mapping using a least-norm direct dipole inversion method.
    Sun H; Ma Y; MacDonald ME; Pike GB
    Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 179():166-175. PubMed ID: 29906634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-echo dipole inversion for magnetic susceptibility mapping.
    Kames C; Doucette J; Rauscher A
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2391-2401. PubMed ID: 36695283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical Note: Optimization of quantitative susceptibility mapping by streaking artifact detection.
    Wu ML; Wang CK; Lin PY; Chao TC
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5715-5722. PubMed ID: 32945538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using a superposed dipole inversion method: Application to intracranial hemorrhage.
    Sun H; Kate M; Gioia LC; Emery DJ; Butcher K; Wilman AH
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Sep; 76(3):781-91. PubMed ID: 26414757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Streaking artifact suppression of quantitative susceptibility mapping reconstructions via L1-norm data fidelity optimization (L1-QSM).
    Milovic C; Lambert M; Langkammer C; Bredies K; Irarrazaval P; Tejos C
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Jan; 87(1):457-473. PubMed ID: 34350634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximum spherical mean value filtering for whole-brain QSM.
    Roberts AG; Romano DJ; Şişman M; Dimov AV; Nguyen TD; Kovanlikaya I; Gauthier SA; Wang Y; Spincemaille P
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 Apr; 91(4):1586-1597. PubMed ID: 38169132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-step calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling.
    Chen L; Cai S; van Zijl PCM; Li X
    NMR Biomed; 2021 Jul; 34(7):e4517. PubMed ID: 33822416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hybrid data fidelity term approach for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
    Lambert M; Tejos C; Langkammer C; Milovic C
    Magn Reson Med; 2022 Aug; 88(2):962-972. PubMed ID: 35435267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.