BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30266677)

  • 1. Increased Efficacy of Stem Cell Chemomobilization with Intermediate-Dose Cytarabine Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Compared with G-CSF Alone in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Czerw T; Sadus-Wojciechowska M; Michalak K; Najda J; Mendrek W; Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M; Glowala-Kosinska M; Chwieduk A; Mitrus I; Smagur A; Holowiecki J; Giebel S
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Feb; 25(2):248-255. PubMed ID: 30266677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytarabine + G-CSF is more effective than cyclophosphamide + G-CSF as a stem cell mobilization regimen in multiple myeloma.
    Jelinek T; Adamusova L; Popkova T; Tvrda I; Smejkalova J; Simicek M; Salounova D; Kascak M; Mihalyova J; Plonkova H; Duras J; Navratil M; Hajek R; Koristek Z
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2019 Jul; 54(7):1107-1114. PubMed ID: 30459429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased efficacy of intermediate-dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to DHAP + G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma: an analysis by the polish lymphoma research group.
    Giebel S; Sadus-Wojciechowska M; Halaburda K; Drozd-Sokolowska J; Wierzbowska A; Najda J; Mendrek W; Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M; Nowicki M; Holowiecki J; Czerw T
    Ann Hematol; 2016 Jan; 95(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 26611854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intermediate-dose cytarabine plus G-CSF as mobilization regimen for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and heavily pre-treated patients with hematological and non-hematological malignancies.
    Callera AF; Rosa ES; Callera F
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2019 Jun; 58(3):318-322. PubMed ID: 30961974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T
    J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Pilot, Exploratory, Randomized, Phase II Safety Study Evaluating Tumor Cell Mobilization and Apheresis Product Contamination in Patients Treated with Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Alone or Plus Plerixafor.
    Nahi H; Celanovic M; Liu Q; Lund J; Peceliunas V
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Jan; 25(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 30149148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
    J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of chemo-free strategy with G-CSF plus plerixafor on demand versus intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF as PBSC mobilization in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: An Italian explorative cost Analysis.
    Laszlo D; Marcacci GP; Martino M; Radice D; Rabascio C; Lucchetti B; Magarò A; Caime A; Menna S; Lionetti MT; Bertolini F
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2020 Oct; 59(5):102819. PubMed ID: 32499108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.
    Hamadani M; Kochuparambil ST; Osman S; Cumpston A; Leadmon S; Bunner P; Watkins K; Morrison D; Speir E; Deremer D; Kota V; Jillella A; Craig M; Awan F
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2012 Jul; 18(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 22248715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.
    Alexander ET; Towery JA; Miller AN; Kramer C; Hogan KR; Squires JE; Stuart RK; Costa LJ
    Transfusion; 2011 Sep; 51(9):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21392017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intermediate-dose CY and G-CSF more efficiently mobilize adequate numbers of PBSC for tandem autologous PBSC transplantation compared with low-dose CY in patients with multiple myeloma.
    Hiwase DK; Bollard G; Hiwase S; Bailey M; Muirhead J; Schwarer AP
    Cytotherapy; 2007; 9(6):539-47. PubMed ID: 17882718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermediate-dose Ara-C plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoid malignancies, including predicted poor mobilizers.
    Giebel S; Kruzel T; Czerw T; Sadus-Wojciechowska M; Najda J; Chmielowska E; Grosicki S; Jurczyszyn A; Pasiarski M; Nowara E; Glowala-Kosinka M; Chwieduk A; Mitrus I; Smagur A; Holowiecki J
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2013 Jul; 48(7):915-21. PubMed ID: 23292239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
    Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
    J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulation of adrenergic activity by desipramine enhances hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell mobilization along with G-CSF in multiple myeloma: A pilot study.
    Shastri A; Budhathoki A; Barta SK; Kornblum N; Derman O; Battini R; Raghupathy R; Verma AK; Frenette PS; Braunschweig I; Janakiram M
    Am J Hematol; 2017 Oct; 92(10):1047-1051. PubMed ID: 28675459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Filgrastim alone versus cyclophosphamide and filgrastim for mobilization in multiple myeloma patients.
    Sarıcı A; Erkurt MA; Bahçecioğlu ÖF; Gök S; Kuku İ; Biçim S; Berber İ; Kaya E; Özgül M
    Transfus Apher Sci; 2021 Aug; 60(4):103159. PubMed ID: 34034961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization using low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for multiple myeloma.
    Shimura Y; Kuroda J; Uchiyama H; Kawata-Iida E; Tsutsumi Y; Nagoshi H; Mizutani S; Yamamoto-Sugitani M; Matsumoto Y; Kobayashi T; Horiike S; Shimazaki C; Kaneko H; Kobayashi Y; Taniwaki M
    J Clin Apher; 2013 Oct; 28(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 23804501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intermediate doses of cytarabine plus granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor as an effective and safe regimen for hematopoietic stem cell collection in lymphoma patients with prior mobilization failure.
    Calderón-Cabrera C; Carmona González M; Martín J; Ríos Herranz E; Noguerol P; De la Cruz F; Carrillo E; Falantes JF; Parody R; Espigado I; Pérez-Simón JA
    Transfusion; 2015 Apr; 55(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 25354577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficacy of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus originator granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in de novo multiple myeloma patients.
    Martino M; Recchia AG; Moscato T; Fedele R; Neri S; Gentile M; Alati C; Vincelli ID; Piro E; Penna G; Musolino C; Ronco F; Molica S; Morabito F
    Cytotherapy; 2015 Oct; 17(10):1485-93. PubMed ID: 26188967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Etoposide + Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Optional Plerixafor in Patients Who Failed Chemomobilization with or without Plerixafor.
    Zucenka A; Peceliunas V; Maciutaite E; Chaleckaite J; Jakimaviciute R; Griskevicius L
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2019 Jul; 25(7):1304-1311. PubMed ID: 30871977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.