These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

675 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30267654)

  • 1. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.
    Boroff ES; Gurudu SR; Hentz JG; Leighton JA; Ramirez FC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 108(6):993-9. PubMed ID: 23567353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
    Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Position change during colonoscope withdrawal increases polyp and adenoma detection in the right but not in the left side of the colon: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Ball AJ; Johal SS; Riley SA
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Sep; 82(3):488-94. PubMed ID: 25910661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.
    Huang Y; Chen F; Xu G; Huang L; Wan R; Yang L; Chen C
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Aug; 10(8):8607-8616. PubMed ID: 34328014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Yield of repeat forward-view examination of the right side of the colon in screening and surveillance colonoscopy.
    Clark BT; Parikh ND; Laine L
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jul; 84(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 26769408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrograde inspection
    Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of autofluorescence imaging for flat neoplasm detection: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (A-FLAT trial).
    Takeuchi Y; Sawaya M; Oka S; Tamai N; Kawamura T; Uraoka T; Ikematsu H; Moriyama T; Arao M; Ishikawa H; Ito Y; Matsuda T
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):460-469. PubMed ID: 30452914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Difference in Physician- and Patient-Dependent Factors Contributing to Adenoma Detection Rate and Serrated Polyp Detection Rate.
    Cavicchi M; Tharsis G; Burtin P; Cattan P; Venezia F; Tordjman G; Gillet A; Samama J; Nahon-Uzan K; Karsenti D
    Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Dec; 64(12):3579-3588. PubMed ID: 31471862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Changeover to Newer Endoscopic Systems on Quality and Efficiency of Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy: Equipment or Endoscopist.
    Singh M; Sacatos M; Laine L
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 52(10):891-895. PubMed ID: 28906425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple method to improve adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: altering patient position.
    Köksal AŞ; Kalkan IH; Torun S; Taşkıran I; Öztaş E; Kayaçetin E; Şaşmaz N
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2013 Sep; 27(9):509-12. PubMed ID: 24078934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cimetropium bromide does not improve polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscope withdrawal: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
    Jung P; Park SB; Kim HW; Kang DH; W Choi C; Kim SJ; Nam HS; Ryu DG; Hong JB; Kim DJ
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11253. PubMed ID: 29924056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and polyp detection rate at endoscopy in a non-screening population.
    Murphy B; Myers E; O'Shea T; Feeley K; Waldron B
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2295. PubMed ID: 32041974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos).
    Su JR; Li Z; Shao XJ; Ji CR; Ji R; Zhou RC; Li GC; Liu GQ; He YS; Zuo XL; Li YQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):415-424.e4. PubMed ID: 31454493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy.
    Kashiwagi K; Inoue N; Yoshida T; Bessyo R; Yoneno K; Imaeda H; Ogata H; Kanai T; Sugino Y; Iwao Y
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174155. PubMed ID: 28328936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Li P; Ma B; Gong S; Zhang X; Li W
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Mar; 35(3):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 32128607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.