These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30268566)

  • 1. Development, Validation, and Comparative Assessment of an International Scoring System to Determine Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Oakland K; Kahan BC; Guizzetti L; Martel M; Bryant RV; Brahmania M; Singh S; Nguyen NQ; Sey MSL; Barkun A; Jairath V
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 17(6):1121-1129.e2. PubMed ID: 30268566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.
    Pognonec C; Dirhoussi Z; Cury N; Moreau M; Billard C; Yordanov Y; Thiebaud PC
    Emerg Med J; 2023 Jun; 40(6):451-457. PubMed ID: 37185303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N; Husic-Selimovic A; Srsen N; Prohic D
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of scoring systems without endoscopic findings for predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ko IG; Kim SE; Chang BS; Kwak MS; Yoon JY; Cha JM; Shin HP; Lee JI; Kim SH; Han JH; Jeon JW
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):159. PubMed ID: 29233096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Utility of the CANUKA Scoring System in the Risk Assessment of Upper GI Bleeding.
    Goff S; Friedman E; Toro B; Almonte M; Wilson C; Lu X; Yu D; Friedenberg F
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2023 Jul; 57(6):595-600. PubMed ID: 36730919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS; Choi J; Shin WC
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA; Dalton H; Blatchford O; Ashley D; Mowat C; Gaya DR; Cahill A; Warshow U; Hare N; Groome M; Forrest EH; Morris J; Stanley AJ
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. External validation of scoring systems in risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Anchu AC; Mohsina S; Sureshkumar S; Mahalakshmy T; Kate V
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2017 Mar; 36(2):105-112. PubMed ID: 28393330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.