583 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30268613)
1. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of single-step genomic evaluation using multiple-trait random regression test-day models in dairy cattle.
Oliveira HR; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Jamrozik J; Brito LF; Silva FF; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2365-2377. PubMed ID: 30638992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data.
Koivula M; Strandén I; Pösö J; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2775-84. PubMed ID: 25660739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle.
Buaban S; Prempree S; Sumreddee P; Duangjinda M; Masuda Y
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Dec; 104(12):12713-12723. PubMed ID: 34538484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.
Boison SA; Utsunomiya ATH; Santos DJA; Neves HHR; Carvalheiro R; Mészáros G; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Verneque RS; Machado MA; Panetto JCC; Garcia JF; Sölkner J; da Silva MVGB
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Jul; 100(7):5479-5490. PubMed ID: 28527809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The marker effects of a single-step random regression model for 4 test-day traits in German Holsteins.
Alkhoder H; Liu Z; Reents R
J Dairy Sci; 2024 Jan; 107(1):423-437. PubMed ID: 37709030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Domestic estimated breeding values and genomic enhanced breeding values of bulls in comparison with their foreign genomic enhanced breeding values.
Přibyl J; Bauer J; Čermák V; Pešek P; Přibylová J; Šplíchal J; Vostrá-Vydrová H; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L
Animal; 2015 Oct; 9(10):1635-42. PubMed ID: 26133272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic predictions for yield traits in US Holsteins with unknown parent groups.
Cesarani A; Masuda Y; Tsuruta S; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2021 May; 104(5):5843-5853. PubMed ID: 33663836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Lawlor TJ; Forni S; Weller JI
J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3930-42. PubMed ID: 24679931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins.
Baba T; Gotoh Y; Yamaguchi S; Nakagawa S; Abe H; Masuda Y; Kawahara T
Anim Sci J; 2017 Aug; 88(8):1226-1231. PubMed ID: 27925408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short communication: Genomic prediction using different single-step methods in the Finnish red dairy cattle population.
Gao H; Koivula M; Jensen J; Strandén I; Madsen P; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10082-10088. PubMed ID: 30146284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genomic prediction of lactation curves for milk, fat, protein, and somatic cell score in Holstein cattle.
Oliveira HR; Brito LF; Silva FF; Lourenco DAL; Jamrozik J; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Jan; 102(1):452-463. PubMed ID: 30391177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
