283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30268677)
1. Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions.
Praça L; Pekam FC; Rego RO; Radermacher K; Wolfart S; Marotti J
Dent Mater; 2018 Nov; 34(11):e280-e288. PubMed ID: 30268677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
Su TS; Sun J
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impression of Subgingival Dental Preparation Can Be Taken with Ultrasound.
Marotti J; Broeckmann J; Chuembou Pekam F; Praça L; Radermacher K; Wolfart S
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 45(2):558-567. PubMed ID: 30454854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
Kim JH; Jeong JH; Lee JH; Cho HW
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 27422237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry IL; Thomas GW; Qian F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 25488521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
