115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269310)
1. Evaluation of beam matching accuracy among six linacs from the same vendor.
Krishnappan C; Radha CA; Balaji K; Mani PK; Subramani V; Thanigaimalai V; Gunasekaran MK; Ramasubramanian V
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):423-433. PubMed ID: 30269310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the dose distribution distorted in IMRT and RapidArc treatment when patient plans are swapped across beam-matched machines?
Krishnappan C; Radha CA; Subramani V; Gunasekaran MK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):111-123. PubMed ID: 27685106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators.
Ashokkumar S; Ganesh KM; Ramalingam K; Karthikeyan K; Jagadheeskumar N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3439-3444. PubMed ID: 29286616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of pulsed IMRT and VMAT for re-irradiation treatments: dosimetric and delivery feasibilities.
Lin MH; Price RA; Li J; Kang S; Li J; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):8179-96. PubMed ID: 24200917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Moving GPU-OpenCL-based Monte Carlo dose calculation toward clinical use: Automatic beam commissioning and source sampling for treatment plan dose calculation.
Tian Z; Li Y; Hassan-Rezaeian N; Jiang SB; Jia X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):69-84. PubMed ID: 28300376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling Elekta VersaHD using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system for photon beams: A single-institution experience.
Zhang Y; Le AH; Tian Z; Iqbal Z; Chiu T; Gu X; Pugachev A; Reynolds R; Park YK; Lin MH; Stojadinovic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):33-42. PubMed ID: 31471950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method for selecting reference beam model of VMAT plans with three 6MV beam-matched linear accelerators during radiation oncology.
Li Y; Wu W; Yuan W; Chai L; Tang F; He R; Lu Y; Zhang Y; Lu Y; Wang L; Wang M; Zhang X; Zhang L
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10131. PubMed ID: 37349531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data.
Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Howell RM; Followill DS; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259. PubMed ID: 32677052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies.
Dhanesar S; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr A; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081710. PubMed ID: 23927307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric impact of dental metallic crown on intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for head and neck cancer.
Kamomae T; Itoh Y; Okudaira K; Nakaya T; Tomida M; Miyake Y; Oguchi H; Shiinoki T; Kawamura M; Yamamoto N; Naganawa S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):234-245. PubMed ID: 26894359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric effect of Elekta Beam modulator micromultileaf in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Carosi A; Ingrosso G; Ponti E; Tolu B; Murgia A; di Cristino D; Santoni R
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 24433833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. mARC prostate treatment planning with Varian Eclipse for flat vs. FFF beams.
Bell K; Dzierma Y; Palm J; Nuesken F; Licht N; Rübe C
Phys Med; 2016 Mar; 32(3):474-8. PubMed ID: 27053450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in a dual-vendor environment.
Dobler B; Groeger C; Treutwein M; Alvarez-Moret J; Goetzfried T; Weidner K; Haertl P; Koelbl O
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Apr; 99(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 21458090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pancreatic cancer planning: Complex conformal vs modulated therapies.
Chapman KL; Witek ME; Chen H; Showalter TN; Bar-Ad V; Harrison AS
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 26831922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
