349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269318)
21. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Markar SR; Arya S; Karthikesalingam A; Hanna GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4274-81. PubMed ID: 23943033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Stapled versus hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Mishra PK; Shah H; Gupta N; Varshney V; Patil NS; Jain A; Saluja SS
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2016 Feb; 5():118-24. PubMed ID: 27222711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques.
Santos RS; Raftopoulos Y; Singh D; DeHoyos A; Fernando HC; Keenan RJ; Luketich JD; Landreneau RJ
Surgery; 2004 Oct; 136(4):917-25. PubMed ID: 15467679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Embedded Three-Layer Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Morbidity and Improves Short-Term Outcomes After Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Sun HB; Li Y; Liu XB; Zhang RX; Wang ZF; Zheng Y; Qin JJ; Li HM; Chen XK; Wu Z
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1131-8. PubMed ID: 26687140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Hand-sewn Versus Side-to-side Linear-stapled Versus Circular-stapled Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Schlottmann F; Angeramo CA; Bras Harriott C; Casas MA; Herbella FAM; Patti MG
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Jun; 32(3):380-392. PubMed ID: 35583556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?
Ercan S; Rice TW; Murthy SC; Rybicki LA; Blackstone EH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Mar; 129(3):623-31. PubMed ID: 15746747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Urschel JD; Blewett CJ; Bennett WF; Miller JD; Young JE
Dis Esophagus; 2001; 14(3-4):212-7. PubMed ID: 11869322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of Minimally Invasive Intrathoracic Hand-sewn Esophago-gastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Charalabopoulos A; Davakis S; Sakarellos P; Mpaili E; Sarlani E; Sakellariou S; Ziogas D; Theochari M; Liakakos T
Anticancer Res; 2023 Jun; 43(6):2749-2755. PubMed ID: 37247891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Okuyama M; Motoyama S; Suzuki H; Saito R; Maruyama K; Ogawa J
Surg Today; 2007; 37(11):947-52. PubMed ID: 17952523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Linear- versus circular-stapled esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Aiolfi A; Sozzi A; Bonitta G; Lombardo F; Cavalli M; Cirri S; Campanelli G; Danelli P; Bona D
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3297-3309. PubMed ID: 36242619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hand-sewn anastomotic technique after esophageal cancer resection.
Nozaki I; Hato S; Yamashita M; Kobatake T; Ohta K; Kubo Y; Kurita A
Hepatogastroenterology; 2014 Oct; 61(135):1957-60. PubMed ID: 25713895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.
Walther B; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Von Holstein CS; Zilling T
Ann Surg; 2003 Dec; 238(6):803-12; discussion 812-4. PubMed ID: 14631217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hybrid Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.
Allaix ME; Long JM; Patti MG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Oct; 26(10):763-767. PubMed ID: 27541591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
