These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269627)

  • 1. Induction of labor versus expectant management among women with macrosomic neonates: a retrospective study.
    Vitner D; Bleicher I; Kadour-Peero E; Borenstein-Levin L; Kugelman A; Sagi S; Gonen R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1831-1839. PubMed ID: 30269627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between timing of labor induction and neonatal and maternal outcomes: an observational study from China.
    Hu Y; Chen B; Wang X; Zhu S; Bao S; Lu J; Wang L; Wang W; Wu C; Qi L; Wang Y; Li F; Xie W; Wu Y; Hu L; Xia Y; Lou B; Guo R; Xie B; Chen X; Han Y; Chen D; Ma H; Liang Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Oct; 6(10):101456. PubMed ID: 39151749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.
    Middleton P; Shepherd E; Morris J; Crowther CA; Gomersall JC
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Jul; 7(7):CD004945. PubMed ID: 32666584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.
    Caughey AB; Sundaram V; Kaimal AJ; Cheng YW; Gienger A; Little SE; Lee JF; Wong L; Shaffer BL; Tran SH; Padula A; McDonald KM; Long EF; Owens DK; Bravata DM
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2009 Mar; (176):1-257. PubMed ID: 19408970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.
    Souter V; Painter I; Sitcov K; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Mar; 220(3):273.e1-273.e11. PubMed ID: 30716284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Timing of induction of labor in suspected macrosomia: retrospective cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Badr DA; Carlin A; Kadji C; Kang X; Cannie MM; Jani JC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 64(4):443-452. PubMed ID: 38477187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).
    Middleton P; Shepherd E; Flenady V; McBain RD; Crowther CA
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jan; 1(1):CD005302. PubMed ID: 28050900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes among Nulliparous Women Undergoing Nonmedically Indicated Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management Differ by Maternal Age.
    Hersh AR; Urbanowicz E; Garg B; Schmidt EM; Packer CH; Caughey AB
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1061-e1068. PubMed ID: 36452970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 26241264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e2838. PubMed ID: 22577197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus.
    Melamed N; Ray JG; Geary M; Bedard D; Yang C; Sprague A; Murray-Davis B; Barrett J; Berger H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):364.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26928149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elective Induction of Labor in the 39th Week of Gestation Compared With Expectant Management of Low-Risk Multiparous Women.
    Sinkey RG; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Ausbeck E; Subramaniam A; Neely CL; Casey BM; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 134(2):282-287. PubMed ID: 31306328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does induction of labor at 41 weeks (early, mid or late) improve birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancy? A nationwide propensity score-matched study.
    Ravelli ACJ; van der Post JAM; de Groot CJM; Abu-Hanna A; Eskes M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 May; 102(5):612-625. PubMed ID: 36915238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Elective Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management among Obese Women at ≥39 Weeks.
    Palatnik A; Kominiarek MA
    Am J Perinatol; 2020 Jun; 37(7):695-707. PubMed ID: 31039597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management in Low-Risk Parous Women.
    Wagner SM; Sandoval G; Grobman WA; Bailit JL; Wapner RJ; Varner MW; Thorp JM; Prasad M; Tita ATN; Saade GR; Sorokin Y; Rouse DJ; Tolosa JE;
    Am J Perinatol; 2022 Apr; 39(5):519-525. PubMed ID: 32916751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal and perinatal outcome of induction at 39 weeks versus expectant management in labor after cesarean section.
    Meyer R; Levin G
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 159(2):480-486. PubMed ID: 35212398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
    Grobman WA; Caughey AB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):304-310. PubMed ID: 30817905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To induce or not to induce labor: a macrosomic dilemma.
    Simhayoff N; Sheiner E; Levy A; Hammel RD; Mazor M; Hallak M
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2004; 58(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 15467303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.