These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269627)

  • 41. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
    Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Non-diabetic fetal macrosomia: outcomes of elective delivery versus expectant management.
    Corbett GA; Hunter S; Javaid A; McNamee E; O'Connell M; Lindow SW; Martin A
    Ir J Med Sci; 2023 Jun; 192(3):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 35781860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?
    Vendittelli F; Rivière O; Neveu B; Lémery D;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 May; 14():156. PubMed ID: 24885981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A risk of waiting: the weekly incidence of hypertensive disorders and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity in low-risk term pregnancies.
    Gibson KS; Waters TP; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):389.e1-389.e12. PubMed ID: 26440691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
    Grobman WA; Rice MM; Reddy UM; Tita ATN; Silver RM; Mallett G; Hill K; Thom EA; El-Sayed YY; Perez-Delboy A; Rouse DJ; Saade GR; Boggess KA; Chauhan SP; Iams JD; Chien EK; Casey BM; Gibbs RS; Srinivas SK; Swamy GK; Simhan HN; Macones GA;
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Aug; 379(6):513-523. PubMed ID: 30089070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Keulen JK; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; Bossuyt PM; Oudijk MA; Duijnhoven RG; van Kaam AH; Vandenbussche FP; van der Post JA; Mol BW; de Miranda E
    BMJ; 2019 Feb; 364():l344. PubMed ID: 30786997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial.
    Wennerholm UB; Saltvedt S; Wessberg A; Alkmark M; Bergh C; Wendel SB; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Sengpiel V; Wesström J; Wennergren G; Wikström AK; Elden H; Stephansson O; Hagberg H
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l6131. PubMed ID: 31748223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].
    Sgayer I; Frank Wolf M
    Harefuah; 2019 Dec; 158(12):802-806. PubMed ID: 31823535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of macrosomic pregnancies.
    Weissmann-Brenner A; Simchen MJ; Zilberberg E; Kalter A; Weisz B; Achiron R; Dulitzky M
    Med Sci Monit; 2012 Sep; 18(9):PH77-81. PubMed ID: 22936200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Childhood health and education outcomes following early term induction for large-for-gestational age: A population-based record linkage study.
    Ibiebele I; Bowen JR; Nippita TA; Morris JM; Ford JB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Apr; 98(4):423-432. PubMed ID: 30511739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Labor induction versus expectant management at early term in pregnancies with second trimester elevated human chorionic gonadotropin or alpha fetoprotein.
    Yefet E; Kuzmin O; Schwartz N; Basson F; Nachum Z
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jun; 44(6):1049-1056. PubMed ID: 29516643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Induction of Labor Compared with Planned Cesarean Delivery in Women with Preeclampsia at 34 Weeks' Gestation or Longer.
    Kawakita T; Bowers K
    Am J Perinatol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 28838008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Induction of labor in term pregnancies with isolated polyhydramnios: Is it beneficial or harmful?
    Lerner Y; Peled T; Priner Adler S; Rotem R; Sela HY; Grisaru-Granovsky S; Rottenstreich M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Sep; 166(3):1203-1211. PubMed ID: 38581215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A Trial of Labor after Cesarean Section with a Macrosomic Neonate. Is It Safe?
    Lopian M; Kashani-Ligumski L; Cohen R; Herzlich J; Perlman S
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e400-e405. PubMed ID: 35750318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring.
    Gibbs Pickens CM; Kramer MR; Howards PP; Badell ML; Caughey AB; Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 131(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 29215512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Is gestational age at term a risk factor for ongoing pregnancies in nulliparous women: A prospective cohort study.
    Quibel T; Rozenberg P; Duvillier C; Bouyer C; Bouyer J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100808. PubMed ID: 36371036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Induction of labour for suspected macrosomia at term in non-diabetic women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Magro-Malosso ER; Saccone G; Chen M; Navathe R; Di Tommaso M; Berghella V
    BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):414-421. PubMed ID: 27921380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cesarean delivery after non-medically indicated induction of labor: A population-based study using different definitions of expectant management.
    Zenzmaier C; Pfeifer B; Leitner H; König-Bachmann M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Feb; 100(2):220-228. PubMed ID: 32880895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?
    Cheng YW; Sparks TN; Laros RK; Nicholson JM; Caughey AB
    BJOG; 2012 Mar; 119(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 22251443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.