These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269641)

  • 21. Ambient noise limits efficacy of smartphone-based screening for hearing loss in children at risk.
    Manayan RC; Ladd-Luthringshauser OH; Packer A; Tribulski K; Winans A; Vecchiotti MA; Scott AR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2022; 43(1):103223. PubMed ID: 34560596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tablet Audiometry in Canada's North: A Portable and Efficient Method for Hearing Screening.
    Rourke R; Kong DC; Bromwich M
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Sep; 155(3):473-8. PubMed ID: 27118819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adult validation of a self-administered tablet audiometer.
    Bastianelli M; Mark AE; McAfee A; Schramm D; Lefrançois R; Bromwich M
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):59. PubMed ID: 31699157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation Study of Kids Hearing Game: A Self-Administered Pediatric Audiology Application.
    Kung B; Kunda L; Groff S; Miele E; Loyd M; Carpenter DM
    Perm J; 2021 May; 25():. PubMed ID: 33970081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparative study of hearing screening procedures.
    FitzZaland RE; Zink GD
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):205-10. PubMed ID: 6468778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of audiometric and objective methods in hearing screening of school children. A preliminary study.
    Śliwa L; Hatzopoulos S; Kochanek K; Piłka A; Senderski A; Skarżyński PH
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Apr; 75(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 21295353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mobile audiometry for hearing threshold assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Oremule B; Abbas J; Saunders G; Kluk K; Isba R; Bate S; Bruce I
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2024 Jan; 49(1):74-86. PubMed ID: 37828806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diagnostic Accuracy of Mobile Health-Based Audiometry for the Screening of Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Wang K; Wei W; Shi J; Qi B; Zhu Z; Li Z
    Telemed J E Health; 2023 Oct; 29(10):1433-1445. PubMed ID: 36862527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Continuous versus pulsed pure-tone audiometry in a group of school-aged children.
    van Dijk C; Osman N
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2008; 55():29-36. PubMed ID: 19485067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Program Review of Head Start and Elementary School Hearing Screenings.
    Hurley A; Willis M; Guidry M; Bode D; Corneille ML; Mills S
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2020 Apr; 51(2):345-352. PubMed ID: 32216695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss.
    Ahn JH; Lee HS; Kim YJ; Yoon TH; Chung JW
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jun; 136(6):966-71. PubMed ID: 17547989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In-situ Audiometry Compared to Conventional Audiometry for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Van Eeckhoutte M; Jasper BS; Kjærbøl EF; Jordell DH; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241259704. PubMed ID: 38835268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Otitis media with effusion in children: Cross-frequency correlation in pure tone audiometry.
    Chow AHC; Cai T; McPherson B; Yang F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221405. PubMed ID: 31437206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tablet-based Hearing Screening in Children Aged 5 to 17 in Rural Dominican Republic.
    Levy DA; Hill DR; Bia FJ; Feinn RS
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):823-828. PubMed ID: 29995002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of Tablet-based Hearing Testing in Nicaraguan Schoolchildren: A Detailed Analysis.
    Magro I; Clavier O; Mojica K; Rieke C; Eisen E; Fried D; Stein-Meyers A; Fellows A; Buckey J; Saunders J
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 31851067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Telemedicine in Audiology. Best practice recommendations from the French Society of Audiology (SFA) and the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL).
    Thai-Van H; Bakhos D; Bouccara D; Loundon N; Marx M; Mom T; Mosnier I; Roman S; Villerabel C; Vincent C; Venail F
    Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis; 2021 Oct; 138(5):363-375. PubMed ID: 33097467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tablet audiometry: Comparison of automated game-based and tester-assisted procedures in children.
    Hopping K; Krishnan LA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jan; 152():111006. PubMed ID: 34923294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.