306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30269863)
1. Restoration integrity, but not material or cementation strategy determined secondary caries lesions next to indirect restorations in vitro.
Lehmensiek M; Askar H; Brouwer F; Blunck U; Paris S; Schwendicke F
Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e317-e323. PubMed ID: 30269863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The association between loading of restorations and secondary caries lesions is moderated by the restoration material elasticity.
Askar H; Brouwer F; Lehmensiek M; Paris S; Schwendicke F
J Dent; 2017 Mar; 58():74-79. PubMed ID: 28065621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations.
Braga RR; Condon JR; Ferracane JL
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(6):368-76. PubMed ID: 12542102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations.
Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate Ceramics Bonded to Enamel or Dentin Using Different Resin Cement Types and Film Thicknesses.
Rojpaibool T; Leevailoj C
J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 26505488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of bond strength between leucite-based and lithium disilicate-based ceramics to dentin after cementation with conventional and self-adhesive resin agents.
Rigolin FJ; Miranda ME; Flório FM; Basting RT
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 25335361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified cementation of lithium disilicate crowns: Retention with various adhesive resin cement combinations.
Johnson GH; Lepe X; Patterson A; Schäfer O
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 28967395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.
Ernst CP; Cohnen U; Stender E; Willershausen B
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):551-8. PubMed ID: 15942616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns.
Preis V; Behr M; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2015 Nov; 31(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 26345998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of preparation design and ceramic thicknesses on fracture resistance and failure modes of premolar partial coverage restorations.
Guess PC; Schultheis S; Wolkewitz M; Zhang Y; Strub JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Oct; 110(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 24079561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal Adaptation and Quality of Interfaces in Lithium Disilicate Crowns - Influence of Manufacturing and Cementation Techniques.
Melo Freire CA; Borges GA; Caldas D; Santos RS; Ignácio SA; Mazur RF
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):185-195. PubMed ID: 27802123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etch and self-adhesive cements bonded to lithium disilicate, enamel and dentin.
Naranjo J; Ali M; Belles D
Tex Dent J; 2015 Nov; 132(11):914-21. PubMed ID: 26845827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials.
Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC
Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
