BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30270657)

  • 1. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
    Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does chlorination of seawater reverse osmosis membranes control biofouling?
    Khan MT; Hong PY; Nada N; Croue JP
    Water Res; 2015 Jul; 78():84-97. PubMed ID: 25917390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monitoring biofouling based on aerobic respiration in reverse osmosis system.
    Yu Y; Park KY; Jung J; Song W; Kim J; Ryu J; Lade H; Kweon J
    J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Apr; 78():247-256. PubMed ID: 30665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
    Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
    Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
    Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid novel test for the determination of biofouling potential on reverse osmosis membranes.
    Manalo CV; Ohno M; Okuda T; Nakai S; Nishijima W
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(12):2978-85. PubMed ID: 27332844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biofiltration pretreatment for reverse osmosis (RO) membrane in a water reclamation system.
    Hu JY; Song LF; Ong SL; Phua ET; Ng WJ
    Chemosphere; 2005 Mar; 59(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15698653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis.
    Warsinger DM; Tow EW; Maswadeh LA; Connors GB; Swaminathan J; Lienhard V JH
    Water Res; 2018 Jun; 137():384-394. PubMed ID: 29573825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control of biofouling by xanthine oxidase on seawater reverse osmosis membranes from a desalination plant: enzyme production and screening of bacterial isolates from the full-scale plant.
    Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Xie Z; Ho G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 65(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28418590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
    Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of water temperature on biofouling development in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
    Farhat NM; Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MCM; Bucs SS; Staal M
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():149-159. PubMed ID: 27450353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.