348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30270657)
21. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of ultraviolet disinfection on the fouling of reverse osmosis membranes for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wu YH; Chen Z; Li X; Wang YH; Liu B; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Wang HB; Tong X; Bai Y; Xu YQ; Ikuno N; Li CF; Zhang HY; Hu HY
Water Res; 2021 May; 195():116995. PubMed ID: 33721675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A simple reaction-diffusion model for initial stages of biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes.
Rashkeev SN; Shomar B
Environ Res; 2020 Nov; 190():110000. PubMed ID: 32771368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of chlorine disinfection on the membrane fouling potential of bacterial strains isolated from fouled reverse osmosis membranes.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Yu T; Zhao XH; Tong X; Bai Y; Huo ZY; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 693():133579. PubMed ID: 31376757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cleaning efficacy of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin for biofouling reduction on reverse osmosis membranes.
Alayande AB; Kim LH; Kim IS
Biofouling; 2016; 32(4):359-70. PubMed ID: 26923225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analyzing and verifying the association of spiral-wound reverse osmosis membrane fouling with different secondary effluents: full-scale experiments.
Luo H; Cui Y; Zhang H; Li C; Wang Z; Song P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():135150. PubMed ID: 31818593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biofouling of reverse-osmosis membranes during tertiary wastewater desalination: microbial community composition.
Al Ashhab A; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Water Res; 2014 Mar; 50():341-9. PubMed ID: 24231030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Combination of cupric ion with hydroxylamine and hydrogen peroxide for the control of bacterial biofilms on RO membranes.
Lee HJ; Kim HE; Lee C
Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():83-90. PubMed ID: 27998786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Nitric oxide treatment for the control of reverse osmosis membrane biofouling.
Barnes RJ; Low JH; Bandi RR; Tay M; Chua F; Aung T; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Rice SA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Apr; 81(7):2515-24. PubMed ID: 25636842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of disinfection-residual-bacteria (DRB) after seven different kinds of disinfection: Biofilm formation, membrane fouling and mechanisms.
Wang HB; Wu YH; Wang WL; Chen Z; Chen GQ; Luo LW; Xue S; Tong X; Zhang ZW; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 844():157079. PubMed ID: 35779720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of microfiltration treatment of secondary wastewater effluent on biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Berry D; Raskin L
Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(1):167-76. PubMed ID: 19815248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of conventional chemical treatment on the microbial population in a biofouling layer of reverse osmosis systems.
Bereschenko LA; Prummel H; Euverink GJ; Stams AJ; van Loosdrecht MC
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):405-16. PubMed ID: 21111441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Membrane fouling and anti-fouling strategies using RO retentate from a municipal water recycling plant as the feed for osmotic power generation.
Chen SC; Amy GL; Chung TS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():144-155. PubMed ID: 26492341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Role of feed water biodegradable substrate concentration on biofouling: Biofilm characteristics, membrane performance and cleanability.
Farhat NM; Javier L; Van Loosdrecht MCM; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2019 Mar; 150():1-11. PubMed ID: 30508707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: assessment by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and microscopic imaging.
Benladghem Z; Seddiki SML; Dergal F; Mahdad YM; Aissaoui M; Choukchou-Braham N
Biofouling; 2022 Sep; 38(8):852-864. PubMed ID: 36314078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A novel scenario for biofouling control of spiral wound membrane systems.
Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC
Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3890-8. PubMed ID: 21592541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Systematic analysis of micromixers to minimize biofouling on reverse osmosis membranes.
Altman SJ; McGrath LK; Jones HD; Sanchez A; Noek R; Clem P; Cook A; Ho CK
Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(12):3545-54. PubMed ID: 20493509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes.
Ying W; Kumar R; Herzberg M; Kasher R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6815-22. PubMed ID: 25920584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
