These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30271538)

  • 1. Toward an ecoregion scale evaluation of eDNA metabarcoding primers: A case study for the freshwater fish biodiversity of the Murray-Darling Basin (Australia).
    Bylemans J; Gleeson DM; Hardy CM; Furlan E
    Ecol Evol; 2018 Sep; 8(17):8697-8712. PubMed ID: 30271538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for freshwater fish detection and quantification: In silico and in tanks.
    Shu L; Ludwig A; Peng Z
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):8281-8294. PubMed ID: 34188886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.
    Kumar G; Reaume AM; Farrell E; Gaither MR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0266720. PubMed ID: 35714082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for marine mollusks and comparison with published primers.
    Shi X; Jiang Y; Cao L; Zeng C
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2024 May; 24(1):73. PubMed ID: 38822255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
    Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multispecies models reveal that eDNA metabarcoding is more sensitive than backpack electrofishing for conducting fish surveys in freshwater streams.
    McColl-Gausden EF; Weeks AR; Coleman RA; Robinson KL; Song S; Raadik TA; Tingley R
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3111-3126. PubMed ID: 32966639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation and development of eDNA metabarcoding primers for comprehensive assessment of Chinese amphibians.
    Wu D; Lee P; Chen H; Yan F; Huang J; He Y; Wu R; Yuan Z
    Integr Zool; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38730493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integrating invasive species risk assessment into environmental DNA metabarcoding reference libraries.
    Mahon AR; Grey EK; Jerde CL
    Ecol Appl; 2023 Jan; 33(1):e2730. PubMed ID: 36054696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for fish community analysis in backwater lakes: A comparison of capture methods.
    Fujii K; Doi H; Matsuoka S; Nagano M; Sato H; Yamanaka H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210357. PubMed ID: 30703107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A manager's guide to using eDNA metabarcoding in marine ecosystems.
    Gold Z; Wall AR; Schweizer TM; Pentcheff ND; Curd EE; Barber PH; Meyer RS; Wayne R; Stolzenbach K; Prickett K; Luedy J; Wetzer R
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e14071. PubMed ID: 36405018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In silico assessment of 18S rDNA metabarcoding markers for the characterization of nematode communities.
    Ficetola GF; Guerrieri A; Cantera I; Bonin A
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0298905. PubMed ID: 38578734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial Representativeness of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Signal for Fish Biodiversity Assessment in a Natural Freshwater System.
    Civade R; Dejean T; Valentini A; Roset N; Raymond JC; Bonin A; Taberlet P; Pont D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157366. PubMed ID: 27359116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
    Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison and validation of some ITS primer pairs useful for fungal metabarcoding studies.
    Op De Beeck M; Lievens B; Busschaert P; Declerck S; Vangronsveld J; Colpaert JV
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e97629. PubMed ID: 24933453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
    Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Merging two eDNA metabarcoding approaches and citizen-science-based sampling to facilitate fish community monitoring along vast Sub-Saharan coastlines.
    Burian A; Bruce K; Tovela E; Bakker J; Balcells L; Bennett R; Chordekar S; Costa HM; Crampton-Platt A; de Boer H; Ross-Gillespie V; de Sacramento A; Sidat N; Simbine L; Ready J; Tang C; Mauvisseau Q
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 Oct; 23(7):1641-1655. PubMed ID: 37464467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.