143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30271722)
1. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 1: Porosity analysis.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; Mathe N; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1102-1110. PubMed ID: 30271722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 2: Density measurement.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; Mathe N; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1117-1123. PubMed ID: 30294559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness.
Plessis AD; Sperling P; Beerlink A; Kruger O; Tshabalala L; Hoosain S; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1111-1116. PubMed ID: 30294558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 4: Metal powder analysis.
du Plessis A; Sperling P; Beerlink A; du Preez WB; le Roux SG
MethodsX; 2018; 5():1336-1345. PubMed ID: 30406023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. X-ray tomography for the advancement of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing.
DU Plessis A
J Microsc; 2022 Mar; 285(3):121-130. PubMed ID: 32496595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In-situ porosity recognition for laser additive manufacturing of 7075-Al alloy using plasma emission spectroscopy.
Ren W; Mazumder J
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19493. PubMed ID: 33173068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complementary Methods for the Assessment of the Porosity of Laser Additive-Manufactured Titanium Alloy.
Petrișor SM; Savin A; Stanciu MD; Prevorovsky Z; Soare M; Nový F; Steigmann R
Materials (Basel); 2023 Sep; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 37834519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of pore structure in cobalt chrome additively manufactured parts using X-ray computed tomography and three-dimensional image analysis.
Kim FH; Moylan SP; Garboczi EJ; Slotwinski JA
Addit Manuf; 2017; 17():. PubMed ID: 32166065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porosity Measurements and Analysis for Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Control.
Slotwinski JA; Garboczi EJ; Hebenstreit KM
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2014; 119():494-528. PubMed ID: 26601041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel approach for quantification of porosity for biomaterial implants using microcomputed tomography (microCT).
Hiu-Yan Y; Ling Q; Kwong-Man L; Ming Z; Kwok-Sui L; Chun-yiu CJ
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Nov; 75(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 16108058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of manufacturing parameters of additively manufactured 316L steel samples using ultrasound fingerprinting.
Zia S; Carlson JE; Åkerfeldt P
Ultrasonics; 2024 Feb; 137():107196. PubMed ID: 37925963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Looking deep into nature: A review of micro-computed tomography in biomimicry.
du Plessis A; Broeckhoven C
Acta Biomater; 2019 Feb; 85():27-40. PubMed ID: 30543937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended CT Void Analysis in FDM Additive Manufacturing Components.
Hernandez-Contreras A; Ruiz-Huerta L; Caballero-Ruiz A; Moock V; Siller HR
Materials (Basel); 2020 Aug; 13(17):. PubMed ID: 32872614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-destructive wood identification using X-ray µCT scanning: which resolution do we need?
Dierickx S; Genbrugge S; Beeckman H; Hubau W; Kibleur P; Van den Bulcke J
Plant Methods; 2024 Jun; 20(1):98. PubMed ID: 38915095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Void Content Determination of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers: A Comparison between Destructive and Non-Destructive Methods.
Elkolali M; Nogueira LP; Rønning PO; Alcocer A
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35335544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microstructural Characterization of Additively Manufactured Metal Components Using Linear and Nonlinear Ultrasonic Techniques.
Park SH; Choi S; Song DG; Jhang KY
Materials (Basel); 2022 May; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 35683173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microscopic dual-energy CT (microDECT): a flexible tool for multichannel ex vivo 3D imaging of biological specimens.
Handschuh S; Beisser CJ; Ruthensteiner B; Metscher BD
J Microsc; 2017 Jul; 267(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 28267884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. X-ray Tomographic Method to Study the Internal Structure of a TiNi-TiB
Korobenkov M; Lebedev M; Promakhov V; Narikovich A
Materials (Basel); 2023 Feb; 16(4):. PubMed ID: 36836981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of Metal Powders Used for Additive Manufacturing.
Slotwinski JA; Garboczi EJ; Stutzman PE; Ferraris CF; Watson SS; Peltz MA
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol; 2014; 119():460-93. PubMed ID: 26601040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the microstructure of plant leaves in 3D with lab-based X-ray computed tomography.
Mathers AW; Hepworth C; Baillie AL; Sloan J; Jones H; Lundgren M; Fleming AJ; Mooney SJ; Sturrock CJ
Plant Methods; 2018; 14():99. PubMed ID: 30455724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
