These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30271857)
1. Science communication in regenerative medicine: Implications for the role of academic society and science policy. Shineha R; Inoue Y; Ikka T; Kishimoto A; Yashiro Y Regen Ther; 2017 Dec; 7():89-97. PubMed ID: 30271857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative analysis of attitudes toward stem cell research and regenerative medicine between six countries - A pilot study. Shineha R; Inoue Y; Yashiro Y Regen Ther; 2022 Jun; 20():187-193. PubMed ID: 35620641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes on Communication Toward Stem Cell Research and Regenerative Medicine Between the Public and the Scientific Community. Shineha R; Inoue Y; Ikka T; Kishimoto A; Yashiro Y Stem Cells Transl Med; 2018 Feb; 7(2):251-257. PubMed ID: 29372590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Regenerative medicine and responsible research and innovation: proposals for a responsible acceleration to the clinic. Webster A Regen Med; 2017 Oct; 12(7):853-864. PubMed ID: 29094647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities. Llorente C; Revuelta G; Carrió M; Porta M PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224262. PubMed ID: 31721768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lithuanian scientists' behavior and views on science communication. Valinciute A Public Underst Sci; 2020 Apr; 29(3):353-362. PubMed ID: 32126899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can scientists and policy makers work together? Choi BC; Pang T; Lin V; Puska P; Sherman G; Goddard M; Ackland MJ; Sainsbury P; Stachenko S; Morrison H; Clottey C J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Aug; 59(8):632-7. PubMed ID: 16020638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientists' incentives and attitudes toward public communication. Rose KM; Markowitz EM; Brossard D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jan; 117(3):1274-1276. PubMed ID: 31911470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social media & stem cell science: examining the discourse. Adams A; Lomax G; Santarini A Regen Med; 2011 Nov; 6(6 Suppl):121-4. PubMed ID: 21999274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies. Braun M; Starkbaum J; Dabrock P PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145033. PubMed ID: 26660160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Besley JC; Nisbet M Public Underst Sci; 2013 Aug; 22(6):644-59. PubMed ID: 23885050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical implications of regenerative medicine in orthopedics: an empirical study with surgeons and scientists in the field. Niemansburg SL; van Delden JJ; Oner FC; Dhert WJ; Bredenoord AL Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 24184644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication barriers between basic scientists and clinicians in regenerative medicine: A qualitative study from Iran. Bidkhori HR; Bahrami AR; Mehrzad S; Bakhshi H; Miri R; Hedayati-Moghaddam MR; Shabani B; Hasanzadeh H; Danaee M; Shamsian SA; Akhavan-Rezayat A; Mohebbi P; Rohani F; M Matin M J Eval Clin Pract; 2021 Aug; 27(4):799-808. PubMed ID: 32876983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Broader impacts" or "responsible research and innovation"? A comparison of two criteria for funding research in science and engineering. Davis M; Laas K Sci Eng Ethics; 2014 Dec; 20(4):963-83. PubMed ID: 24155159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting scientists' participation in public life. Besley JC; Oh SH; Nisbet M Public Underst Sci; 2013 Nov; 22(8):971-87. PubMed ID: 23825262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Explaining science funding attitudes in the United States: The case for science interest. Motta M Public Underst Sci; 2019 Feb; 28(2):161-176. PubMed ID: 30156123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation. Colizzi V; Mezzana D; Ovseiko PV; Caiati G; Colonnello C; Declich A; Buchan AM; Edmunds L; Buzan E; Zerbini L; Djilianov D; Kalpazidou Schmidt E; Bielawski KP; Elster D; Salvato M; Alcantara LCJ; Minutolo A; Potestà M; Bachiddu E; Milano MJ; Henderson LR; Kiparoglou V; Friesen P; Sheehan M; Moyankova D; Rusanov K; Wium M; Raszczyk I; Konieczny I; Gwizdala JP; Śledzik K; Barendziak T; Birkholz J; Müller N; Warrelmann J; Meyer U; Filser J; Khouri Barreto F; Montesano C JMIR Res Protoc; 2019 Mar; 8(3):e11745. PubMed ID: 30843870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of, interest in, and understanding of induced pluripotent stem cells and regenerative medicine in Japanese students. Ishihara K; Ichinomiya A; Inami M; Hashimoto T; Yuzawa R; Ishizu M; Hirohara T; Yashiro Y; Takizawa T Regen Ther; 2016 Dec; 5():96-106. PubMed ID: 31245507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Science and society: a stem cell technology model. Kiatpongsan S J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Feb; 91(2):268-71. PubMed ID: 18389995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]