These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30272461)

  • 1. Paradox resolved: Stop signal race model with negative dependence.
    Colonius H; Diederich A
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Nov; 125(6):1051-1058. PubMed ID: 30272461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibiting responses to difficult choices.
    Matzke D; Curley S; Gong CQ; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jan; 148(1):124-142. PubMed ID: 30596441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.
    Logan GD; Yamaguchi M; Schall JD; Palmeri TJ
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Apr; 122(2):115-47. PubMed ID: 25706403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating a race model account of executive control in rats with the countermanding paradigm.
    Beuk J; Beninger RJ; Paré M
    Neuroscience; 2014 Mar; 263():96-110. PubMed ID: 24440749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.
    Corneil BD; Elsley JK
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Jul; 94(1):883-95. PubMed ID: 15728762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades.
    Boucher L; Palmeri TJ; Logan GD; Schall JD
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Apr; 114(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 17500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A unified account of simple and response-selective inhibition.
    Gronau QF; Hinder MR; Salomoni SE; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    Cogn Psychol; 2024 Mar; 149():101628. PubMed ID: 38199181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pigeons' performance in a tracking change-signal procedure is consistent with the independent horse-race model.
    Lea SEG; Chow PKY; Meier C; McLaren IPL; Verbruggen F
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(4):464-473. PubMed ID: 31368768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Independent component analysis of functional networks for response inhibition: Inter-subject variation in stop signal reaction time.
    Zhang S; Tsai SJ; Hu S; Xu J; Chao HH; Calhoun VD; Li CS
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Sep; 36(9):3289-302. PubMed ID: 26089095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict anticipation in alcohol dependence - A model-based fMRI study of stop signal task.
    Hu S; Ide JS; Zhang S; Sinha R; Li CS
    Neuroimage Clin; 2015; 8():39-50. PubMed ID: 26106526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for selective adjustments of inhibitory control in a variant of the stop signal task.
    Xu KZ; Mayse JD; Courtney S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):818-831. PubMed ID: 29589791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pimping inhibition: Anodal tDCS enhances stop-signal reaction time.
    Friehs MA; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1933-1945. PubMed ID: 30299126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.
    Bompas A; Campbell AE; Sumner P
    Psychol Rev; 2020 Jul; 127(4):524-561. PubMed ID: 31999149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.
    Mirabella G; Pani P; Paré M; Ferraina S
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 174(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 16636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.
    Verbruggen F; Aron AR; Band GP; Beste C; Bissett PG; Brockett AT; Brown JW; Chamberlain SR; Chambers CD; Colonius H; Colzato LS; Corneil BD; Coxon JP; Dupuis A; Eagle DM; Garavan H; Greenhouse I; Heathcote A; Huster RJ; Jahfari S; Kenemans JL; Leunissen I; Li CR; Logan GD; Matzke D; Morein-Zamir S; Murthy A; Paré M; Poldrack RA; Ridderinkhof KR; Robbins TW; Roesch M; Rubia K; Schachar RJ; Schall JD; Stock AK; Swann NC; Thakkar KN; van der Molen MW; Vermeylen L; Vink M; Wessel JR; Whelan R; Zandbelt BB; Boehler CN
    Elife; 2019 Apr; 8():. PubMed ID: 31033438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.
    Gulberti A; Arndt PA; Colonius H
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():61. PubMed ID: 24600371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancelling of pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans and monkeys.
    Kornylo K; Dill N; Saenz M; Krauzlis RJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jun; 89(6):2984-99. PubMed ID: 12783947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response inhibition and response monitoring in a saccadic double-step task in schizophrenia.
    Thakkar KN; Schall JD; Logan GD; Park S
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Apr; 95():90-8. PubMed ID: 25769133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inhibitory Control Processes and the Strategies That Support Them during Hand and Eye Movements.
    Schmitt LM; Ankeny LD; Sweeney JA; Mosconi MW
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1927. PubMed ID: 28018266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions.
    Matzke D; Dolan CV; Logan GD; Brown SD; Wagenmakers EJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1047-73. PubMed ID: 23163766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.