These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30272464)

  • 1. Why we move to the right? The dominant hand motor-spatial bias.
    Daini R; Vallar G; Arduino LS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Oct; 147(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 30272464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of the right superior temporal gyrus in stimulus-centered spatial processing.
    Shah-Basak PP; Chen P; Caulfield K; Medina J; Hamilton RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():6-13. PubMed ID: 29578025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Setting the midpoint of sentences: The role of the left hemisphere.
    Veronelli L; Arduino LS; Biscaro V; Corbo M; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 137():107287. PubMed ID: 31863803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Line and word bisection in right-brain-damaged patients with left spatial neglect.
    Veronelli L; Vallar G; Marinelli CV; Primativo S; Arduino LS
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 232(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 24146192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More far is more right: Manual and ocular line bisections, but not the Judd illusion, depend on radial space.
    Rinaldi L; Bertolini G; Bockisch CJ; Maravita A; Girelli L; Brugger P
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Apr; 122():34-44. PubMed ID: 29428805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Right up there: hemispatial and hand asymmetries of altitudinal pseudoneglect.
    Suavansri K; Falchook AD; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Aug; 79(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 22546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using scissors to bisect a line: a perception-action dissociation in complex tool use.
    Massen C; Rieger M; Sülzenbrück S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):172-8. PubMed ID: 24132710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Left-handers' struggle in a rightward wor(l)d: The relation between horizontal spatial bias and effort in directed movements.
    Suitner C; Maass A; Bettinsoli ML; Carraro L; Kumar S
    Laterality; 2017 Jan; 22(1):60-89. PubMed ID: 26720399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional and perceptual asymmetries in an immersive decision-making task.
    Klatt S; Ford PR; Smeeton NJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1847-1857. PubMed ID: 31808113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tactile rod bisection in the absence of visuo-spatial processing in children, mid-age and older adults.
    Brooks JL; Della Sala S; Logie RH
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3392-8. PubMed ID: 21875610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved Accuracy on Lateralized Spatial Judgments in Healthy Aging.
    Williamson JB; Murphy A; Lamb DG; Schwartz Z; Szeles D; Harciarek M; Mańkowska A; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Nov; 25(10):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 31543083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines.
    Loftus AM; Nicholls ME; Mattingley JB; Chapman HL; Bradshaw JL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):925-45. PubMed ID: 18780193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict and integration of spatial attention between disconnected hemispheres.
    Ishiai S; Koyama Y; Furuya T
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2001 Oct; 71(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 11561029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of stimulus proximity on judgments of spatial relationships in patients with chronic unilateral right or left hemisphere stroke.
    Williamson JB; Haque S; Burtis B; Harciarek M; Lamb D; Zilli E; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 25350787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Gardner S; Thut G
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 22270326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Right fronto-parietal dysfunction underlying spatial attention in bipolar disorder.
    Najt P; Bayer U; Hausmann M
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):479-84. PubMed ID: 23916624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential effects modulate spatial biases.
    Gökaydin D; Brugger P; Loetscher T
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Oct; 146(10):1438-1447. PubMed ID: 28872329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.