These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30273487)

  • 1. Protein Family-Specific Models Using Deep Neural Networks and Transfer Learning Improve Virtual Screening and Highlight the Need for More Data.
    Imrie F; Bradley AR; van der Schaar M; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2319-2330. PubMed ID: 30273487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FINDSITE
    Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning.
    Pereira JC; Caffarena ER; Dos Santos CN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2495-2506. PubMed ID: 28024405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward fully automated high performance computing drug discovery: a massively parallel virtual screening pipeline for docking and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area rescoring to improve enrichment.
    Zhang X; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 24358939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hidden bias in the DUD-E dataset leads to misleading performance of deep learning in structure-based virtual screening.
    Chen L; Cruz A; Ramsey S; Dickson CJ; Duca JS; Hornak V; Koes DR; Kurtzman T
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220113. PubMed ID: 31430292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deffini: A family-specific deep neural network model for structure-based virtual screening.
    Zhou D; Liu F; Zheng Y; Hu L; Huang T; Huang YS
    Comput Biol Med; 2022 Dec; 151(Pt B):106323. PubMed ID: 36436482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deep Learning in Drug Discovery.
    Gawehn E; Hiss JA; Schneider G
    Mol Inform; 2016 Jan; 35(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 27491648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docking Score ML: Target-Specific Machine Learning Models Improving Docking-Based Virtual Screening in 155 Targets.
    Liu H; Hu B; Chen P; Wang X; Wang H; Wang S; Wang J; Lin B; Cheng M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Jul; 64(14):5413-5426. PubMed ID: 38958413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for breast cancer screening.
    Chougrad H; Zouaki H; Alheyane O
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Apr; 157():19-30. PubMed ID: 29477427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of machine learning approaches for novel drug discovery.
    Lima AN; Philot EA; Trossini GH; Scott LP; Maltarollo VG; Honorio KM
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016; 11(3):225-39. PubMed ID: 26814169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Convolutional neural network scoring and minimization in the D3R 2017 community challenge.
    Sunseri J; King JE; Francoeur PG; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 29992528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Machine Learning Classification Models to Improve the Docking-based Screening: A Case of PI3K-Tankyrase Inhibitors.
    Berishvili VP; Voronkov AE; Radchenko EV; Palyulin VA
    Mol Inform; 2018 Nov; 37(11):e1800030. PubMed ID: 29901257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A renaissance of neural networks in drug discovery.
    Baskin II; Winkler D; Tetko IV
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2016 Aug; 11(8):785-95. PubMed ID: 27295548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints.
    Kearnes S; McCloskey K; Berndl M; Pande V; Riley P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Aug; 30(8):595-608. PubMed ID: 27558503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Need of Bias Control: Evaluating Chemical Data for Machine Learning in Structure-Based Virtual Screening.
    Sieg J; Flachsenberg F; Rarey M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):947-961. PubMed ID: 30835112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved Method of Structure-Based Virtual Screening via Interaction-Energy-Based Learning.
    Yasuo N; Sekijima M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 30808172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. FitScore: a fast machine learning-based score for 3D virtual screening enrichment.
    Gehlhaar DK; Mermelstein DJ
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2024 Aug; 38(1):29. PubMed ID: 39150579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.