These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30273591)

  • 1. G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).
    Shirin H; Shpak B; Epshtein J; Karstensen JG; Hoffman A; de Ridder R; Testoni PA; Ishaq S; Reddy DN; Gross SA; Neumann H; Goetz M; Abramowich D; Moshkowitz M; Mizrahi M; Vilmann P; Rey JW; Sanduleanu-Dascalescu S; Viale E; Chaudhari H; Pochapin MB; Yair M; Shnell M; Yaari S; Hendel JW; Teubner D; Bogie RMM; Notaristefano C; Simantov R; Gluck N; Israeli E; Stigaard T; Matalon S; Vilkin A; Benson A; Sloth S; Maliar A; Waizbard A; Jacob H; Thielsen P; Shachar E; Rochberger S; Hershcovici T; Plougmann JI; Braverman M; Tsvang E; Abedi AA; Brachman Y; Siersema PD; Kiesslich R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 30273591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of adenoma detection and miss rates between a novel balloon colonoscope and standard colonoscopy: a randomized tandem study.
    Halpern Z; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Shpak B; Pochapin M; Hoffman A; Mizrahi M; Rochberger YS; Moshkowitz M; Santo E; Melhem A; Grinshpon R; Pfefer J; Kiesslich R
    Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 25704662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and efficacy of a novel balloon colonoscope: a prospective cohort study.
    Gralnek IM; Suissa A; Domanov S
    Endoscopy; 2014 Oct; 46(10):883-7. PubMed ID: 25225962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
    Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study.
    Jung Y; Joo YE; Kim HG; Jeon SR; Cha JM; Yang HJ; Kim JW; Lee J; Kim KO; Song HK; Hwangbo Y; Shin JE
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Mar; 89(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 30267654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
    Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
    DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.
    De Palma GD; Giglio MC; Bruzzese D; Gennarelli N; Maione F; Siciliano S; Manzo B; Cassese G; Luglio G
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jan; 87(1):232-240. PubMed ID: 28082115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Kahi CJ; Anderson JC; Waxman I; Kessler WR; Imperiale TF; Li X; Rex DK
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Jun; 105(6):1301-7. PubMed ID: 20179689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
    Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial.
    Ngu WS; Bevan R; Tsiamoulos ZP; Bassett P; Hoare Z; Rutter MD; Clifford G; Totton N; Lee TJ; Ramadas A; Silcock JG; Painter J; Neilson LJ; Saunders BP; Rees CJ
    Gut; 2019 Feb; 68(2):280-288. PubMed ID: 29363535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced technology for the improvement of adenoma and polyp detection during colonoscopy.
    Moriyama T; Uraoka T; Esaki M; Matsumoto T
    Dig Endosc; 2015 Apr; 27 Suppl 1():40-4. PubMed ID: 25556542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panchromoendoscopy Increases Detection of Polyps in Patients With Serrated Polyposis Syndrome.
    López-Vicente J; Rodríguez-Alcalde D; Hernández L; Riu Pons F; Vega P; Herrero Rivas JM; Santiago García J; Salces Franco I; Bustamante Balén M; López-Cerón M; Pellisé M;
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Sep; 17(10):2016-2023.e6. PubMed ID: 30366156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a real-time automatic quality control system on colorectal polyp and adenoma detection: a prospective randomized controlled study (with videos).
    Su JR; Li Z; Shao XJ; Ji CR; Ji R; Zhou RC; Li GC; Liu GQ; He YS; Zuo XL; Li YQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Feb; 91(2):415-424.e4. PubMed ID: 31454493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy according to lesion location and endoscopist training level.
    Kim DJ; Kim HW; Park SB; Kang DH; Choi CW; Hong JB; Ji BH; Lee CS
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 May; 21(20):6261-70. PubMed ID: 26034361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.
    Gkolfakis P; Tziatzios G; Dimitriadis GD; Triantafyllou K
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jun; 23(21):3784-3796. PubMed ID: 28638218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced flat adenoma detection rate with high definition colonoscopy plus i-scan for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Rodríguez-D Jesus A; Saperas E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2016 May; 108(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 27023867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model.
    Hasan N; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Pochapin M; Kiesslich R; Halpern Z
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24929483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endoscopic innovations to increase the adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy.
    Dik VK; Moons LM; Siersema PD
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 20(9):2200-11. PubMed ID: 24605019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cap assisted colonoscopy for the detection of serrated polyps: a post-hoc analysis.
    Rzouq F; Gupta N; Wani S; Sharma P; Bansal A; Rastogi A
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25652842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.