These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30273957)

  • 1. High-precision noise power spectrum measurements in digital radiography imaging.
    Kim DS
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5461-5471. PubMed ID: 30273957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method to estimate fan-beam CT noise power spectrum using two basis functions with a limited number of noise realizations.
    Jang H; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1619-1634. PubMed ID: 35028944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Techniques to improve the accuracy of noise power spectrum measurements in digital x-ray imaging based on background trends removal.
    Zhou Z; Gao F; Zhao H; Zhang L
    Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1600-10. PubMed ID: 21520872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the precision in the estimates of noise power spectrum in digital x-ray imaging systems.
    González-López A
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 64(23):235009. PubMed ID: 31694006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating local noise power spectrum from a few FBP-reconstructed CT scans.
    Zeng R; Gavrielides MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Li Q; Myers KJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 43(1):568. PubMed ID: 26745949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
    Kuhls-Gilcrist A; Jain A; Bednarek DR; Hoffmann KR; Rudin S
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):724-35. PubMed ID: 20229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comprehensive model for quantum noise characterization in digital mammography.
    Monnin P; Bosmans H; Verdun FR; Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 61(5):2083-108. PubMed ID: 26895467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficient detrending of uniform images for accurate determination of the noise power spectrum at low frequencies.
    González-López A; Campos-Morcillo PA
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105001. PubMed ID: 30995618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. MTF and DQE enhancement using an apodized-aperture x-ray detector design.
    Nano TF; Escartin T; Ismailova E; Karim KS; Lindström J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4525-4535. PubMed ID: 28636792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum.
    Dobbins JT; Samei E; Ranger NT; Chen Y
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1466-75. PubMed ID: 16752581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Zhao Q; Du H; Daniel J; Street R
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):553-65. PubMed ID: 15789602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noise Power Spectrum Measurements in Digital Imaging With Gain Nonuniformity Correction.
    Kim DS
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Aug; 25(8):3712-22. PubMed ID: 27254867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental measurement of local noise power spectrum (NPS) in photon counting detector-CT (PCD-CT) using a single data acquisition.
    Zhang C; Li K; Zhang R; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4081-4094. PubMed ID: 38703355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Investigation of error factors in analysis of digital noise power spectrum].
    Kunitomo H; Ichikawa K; Higashide R; Ohashi K; Sawada M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Jul; 66(7):734-42. PubMed ID: 20702993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of the noise power spectrum for digital x-ray imaging devices.
    Kim DS
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Jan; 69(3):. PubMed ID: 38157548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectral analysis of mammographic images using a multitaper method.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):801-10. PubMed ID: 22320790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of local noise power spectrum and wavelet analysis in quantitative image quality assurance for EPIDs.
    Lee S; Yan G; Bassett P; Gopal A; Samant S
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):4996. PubMed ID: 27587030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image simulation and a model of noise power spectra across a range of mammographic beam qualities.
    Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Diaz O; Young KC
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121901. PubMed ID: 25471961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 50 μm pixel pitch wafer-scale CMOS active pixel sensor x-ray detector for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhao C; Konstantinidis AC; Zheng Y; Anaxagoras T; Speller RD; Kanicki J
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):8977-9001. PubMed ID: 26540090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.