These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30274863)

  • 1. Modeling solute reactivity in a phreatic solution conduit penetrating a karst aquifer.
    Field MS; Schiesser WE
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Oct; 217():52-70. PubMed ID: 30274863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laboratory analog and numerical study of groundwater flow and solute transport in a karst aquifer with conduit and matrix domains.
    Faulkner J; Hu BX; Kish S; Hua F
    J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Nov; 110(1-2):34-44. PubMed ID: 19767123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Solute Migration from the Aquifer Matrix into a Solution Conduit and the Reverse.
    Li G; Field MS
    Ground Water; 2016 Sep; 54(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 26991943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification and Estimation of Solute Storage and Release in Karst Water Systems, South China.
    Zhang L; Luo M; Chen Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 33023167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical solution of advective mixing in a conduit.
    Li G
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(5):714-22. PubMed ID: 19735310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical study of groundwater flow cycling controlled by seawater/freshwater interaction in a coastal karst aquifer through conduit network using CFPv2.
    Xu Z; Hu BX; Davis H; Kish S
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Nov; 182():131-45. PubMed ID: 26387032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation of solute transport behaviors in saturated karst aquifer system.
    Chu X; Ding H; Zhang X
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):15614. PubMed ID: 34341394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined physical and chemical nonequilibrium transport model for solution conduits.
    Field MS; Leij FJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Feb; 157():37-46. PubMed ID: 24292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back to the future: Comparing yeast as an outmoded artificial tracer for simulating microbial transport in karst aquifer systems to more modern approaches.
    Vucinic L; O'Connell D; Coxon C; Gill L
    Environ Pollut; 2024 May; 349():123942. PubMed ID: 38604303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lattice Boltzmann models for flow and transport in saturated karst.
    Anwar S; Sukop MC
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(3):401-13. PubMed ID: 19016892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel analytical model of solute transport in a layered aquifer system with mixing processes in the reservoirs.
    Shi W; Wang Q; Salihu Danlami M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(45):67953-67968. PubMed ID: 35524852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of thin aquitards on two-dimensional solute transport in an aquifer.
    Rezaei A; Zhan H; Zare M
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Sep; 152():117-36. PubMed ID: 23906486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatially varying dispersion to model breakthrough curves.
    Li G
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):584-92. PubMed ID: 21143474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of pollution and recovery time of karst springs, an example from a carbonate aquifer in Israel.
    Magal E; Arbel Y; Caspi S; Glazman H; Greenbaum N; Yechieli Y
    J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Feb; 145():26-36. PubMed ID: 23270817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding changes in the hydrological behaviour within a karst aquifer (Lurbach system, Austria).
    Mayaud C; Wagner T; Benischke R; Birk S
    Carbonates Evaporites; 2016; 31(4):357-365. PubMed ID: 28077913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Upstream Dispersion in Solute Transport Models: A Simple Evaluation and Reduction Methodology.
    Irvine DJ; Werner AD; Ye Y; Jazayeri A
    Ground Water; 2021 Mar; 59(2):287-291. PubMed ID: 32754918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental and modeling evidence of kilometer-scale anomalous tracer transport in an alpine karst aquifer.
    Goeppert N; Goldscheider N; Berkowitz B
    Water Res; 2020 Jul; 178():115755. PubMed ID: 32348930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Step-like rising and falling of a breakthrough curve observed at a karst spring.
    Liu H; Li G
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Nov; 235():103726. PubMed ID: 33031983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Karst spring responses examined by process-based modeling.
    Birk S; Liedl R; Sauter M
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 17087755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can Karst Conduit Models Be Calibrated? A Dual Approach Using Dye Tracing and Temperature.
    Berglund JL; Toran L; Herman EK
    Ground Water; 2020 Nov; 58(6):924-937. PubMed ID: 32052862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.