These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30275194)

  • 1. Differential Mobility of Breast Cancer Cells and Normal Breast Epithelial Cells Under DC Electrophoresis and Electroosmosis.
    Dutta D; Russell C; Kim J; Chandra S
    Anticancer Res; 2018 Oct; 38(10):5733-5738. PubMed ID: 30275194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dielectrophoretic focusing of particles in a microchannel constriction using DC-biased AC flectric fields.
    Zhu J; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Aug; 30(15):2668-75. PubMed ID: 19621378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of electroosmotic and electrophoretic velocities using pulsed and sinusoidal electric fields.
    Sadek SH; Pimenta F; Pinho FT; Alves MA
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Apr; 38(7):1022-1037. PubMed ID: 27990654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Micropump based on electroosmosis of the second kind.
    Mishchuk NA; Heldal T; Volden T; Auerswald J; Knapp H
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Oct; 30(20):3499-506. PubMed ID: 19784952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective trapping of single mammalian breast cancer cells by insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Bhattacharya S; Chao TC; Ariyasinghe N; Ruiz Y; Lake D; Ros R; Ros A
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2014 Mar; 406(7):1855-65. PubMed ID: 24408303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid concentration of deoxyribonucleic acid via Joule heating induced temperature gradient focusing in poly-dimethylsiloxane microfluidic channel.
    Ge Z; Wang W; Yang C
    Anal Chim Acta; 2015 Feb; 858():91-7. PubMed ID: 25597807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joule heating effects on electroosmotic flow in insulator-based dielectrophoresis.
    Sridharan S; Zhu J; Hu G; Xuan X
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(17):2274-81. PubMed ID: 21792988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of particle capture in a sawtooth patterned insulating electrokinetic microfluidic device.
    Staton SJ; Chen KP; Taylor TJ; Pacheco JR; Hayes MA
    Electrophoresis; 2010 Nov; 31(22):3634-41. PubMed ID: 21077235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonlinear electrokinetic effects in insulator-based dielectrophoretic systems.
    Wang Q; Dingari NN; Buie CR
    Electrophoresis; 2017 Oct; 38(20):2576-2586. PubMed ID: 28763135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AC Electric Field-Induced Trapping of Microparticles in Pinched Microconfinements.
    Dey R; Shaik VA; Chakraborty D; Ghosal S; Chakraborty S
    Langmuir; 2015 Jun; 31(21):5952-61. PubMed ID: 25954982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Continuous microfluidic DNA and protein trapping and concentration by balancing transverse electrokinetic forces.
    Morales MC; Lin H; Zahn JD
    Lab Chip; 2012 Jan; 12(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 22045330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A continuous DC-insulator dielectrophoretic sorter of microparticles.
    Srivastava SK; Baylon-Cardiel JL; Lapizco-Encinas BH; Minerick AR
    J Chromatogr A; 2011 Apr; 1218(13):1780-9. PubMed ID: 21338990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short communication: A simple and accurate method of measuring the zeta-potential of microfluidic channels.
    Fernández-Mateo R; García-Sánchez P; Calero V; Ramos A; Morgan H
    Electrophoresis; 2022 Jun; 43(12):1259-1262. PubMed ID: 34755360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dielectrophoretic particle-particle interaction under AC electrohydrodynamic flow conditions.
    Lee DH; Yu C; Papazoglou E; Farouk B; Noh HM
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Sep; 32(17):2298-306. PubMed ID: 21823132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zeta potential and electroosmotic mobility in microfluidic devices fabricated from hydrophobic polymers: 1. The origins of charge.
    Tandon V; Bhagavatula SK; Nelson WC; Kirby BJ
    Electrophoresis; 2008 Mar; 29(5):1092-101. PubMed ID: 18306184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transient zeta-potential measurements in hydrophobic, TOPAS microfluidic substrates.
    Tandon V; Bhagavatula SK; Kirby BJ
    Electrophoresis; 2009 Aug; 30(15):2656-67. PubMed ID: 19637218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deformability study of breast cancer cells using microfluidics.
    Hou HW; Li QS; Lee GY; Kumar AP; Ong CN; Lim CT
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Jun; 11(3):557-64. PubMed ID: 19082733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrified lab on disc systems: A comprehensive review on electrokinetic applications.
    Kordzadeh-Kermani V; Madadelahi M; Ashrafizadeh SN; Kulinsky L; Martinez-Chapa SO; Madou MJ
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2022 Oct; 214():114381. PubMed ID: 35820257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential susceptibility of nonmalignant human breast epithelial cells and breast cancer cells to thiol antioxidant-induced G(1)-delay.
    Menon SG; Coleman MC; Walsh SA; Spitz DR; Goswami PC
    Antioxid Redox Signal; 2005; 7(5-6):711-8. PubMed ID: 15890017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous Determination of Linear and Nonlinear Electrophoretic Mobilities of Cells and Microparticles.
    Antunez-Vela S; Perez-Gonzalez VH; De Peña AC; Lentz CJ; Lapizco-Encinas BH
    Anal Chem; 2020 Nov; 92(22):14885-14891. PubMed ID: 33108182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.