BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30275656)

  • 1. A quasi-score statistic for homogeneity testing against covariate-varying heterogeneity.
    Todem D; Hsu WW; Fine JP
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2018 Sep; 45(3):465-481. PubMed ID: 30275656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A score-type test for heterogeneity in zero-inflated models in a stratified population.
    Cao G; Hsu WW; Todem D
    Stat Med; 2014 May; 33(12):2103-14. PubMed ID: 24488881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sup-score test for the cure fraction in mixture models for long-term survivors.
    Hsu WW; Todem D; Kim K
    Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1348-1357. PubMed ID: 27078815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A robust score test of homogeneity for zero-inflated count data.
    Hsu WW; Todem D; Mawella NR; Kim K; Rosenkranz RR
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3653-3665. PubMed ID: 32646310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the efficiency of score tests for homogeneity in two-component parametric models for discrete data.
    Todem D; Hsu WW; Kim K
    Biometrics; 2012 Sep; 68(3):975-82. PubMed ID: 22348298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonparametric scanning tests of homogeneity for hierarchical models with continuous covariates.
    Todem D; Hsu WW; Kim K
    Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2063-2075. PubMed ID: 36454666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Simple Chi-Square Statistic for Testing Homogeneity of Zero-Inflated Distributions.
    Johnson WD; Burton JH; Beyl RA; Romer JE
    Open J Stat; 2015 Oct; 5(6):483-493. PubMed ID: 26634181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing homogeneity in semiparametric mixture case-control models.
    Di CZ; Chan KCG; Zheng C; Liang KY
    Commun Stat Theory Methods; 2017; 46(18):9092-9100. PubMed ID: 29725157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous statistical modelling of excess zeros, over/underdispersion, and multimodality with applications in hotel industry.
    Song KS
    J Appl Stat; 2021; 48(9):1603-1627. PubMed ID: 35706570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginalized mixture models for count data from multiple source populations.
    Benecha HK; Neelon B; Divaris K; Preisser JS
    J Stat Distrib Appl; 2017; 4(1):3. PubMed ID: 28446995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginalized multilevel hurdle and zero-inflated models for overdispersed and correlated count data with excess zeros.
    Kassahun W; Neyens T; Molenberghs G; Faes C; Verbeke G
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4402-19. PubMed ID: 24957791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment and Selection of Competing Models for Zero-Inflated Microbiome Data.
    Xu L; Paterson AD; Turpin W; Xu W
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129606. PubMed ID: 26148172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bivariate zero-inflated regression for count data: a Bayesian approach with application to plant counts.
    Majumdar A; Gries C
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(1):Article 27. PubMed ID: 21969981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating Statistical Hypotheses Using Weakly-Identifiable Estimating Functions.
    Cao G; Todem D; Yang L; Fine JP
    Scand Stat Theory Appl; 2013 Jun; 40(2):256-273. PubMed ID: 23788826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical Likelihood in Nonignorable Covariate-Missing Data Problems.
    Xie Y; Zhang B
    Int J Biostat; 2017 Apr; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28441139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On testing for homogeneity with zero-inflated models through the lens of model misspecification.
    Hsu WW; Mawella NR; Todem D
    Int Stat Rev; 2022 Apr; 90(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 35601991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginalized zero-inflated negative binomial regression with application to dental caries.
    Preisser JS; Das K; Long DL; Divaris K
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(10):1722-35. PubMed ID: 26568034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal mean models for zero-inflated count data.
    Todem D; Kim K; Hsu WW
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 26890497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On performance of parametric and distribution-free models for zero-inflated and over-dispersed count responses.
    Tang W; Lu N; Chen T; Wang W; Gunzler DD; Han Y; Tu XM
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(24):3235-45. PubMed ID: 26078035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling count data with excessive zeros: the need for class prediction in zero-inflated models and the issue of data generation in choosing between zero-inflated and generic mixture models for dental caries data.
    Gilthorpe MS; Frydenberg M; Cheng Y; Baelum V
    Stat Med; 2009 Dec; 28(28):3539-53. PubMed ID: 19902494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.