These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30275983)

  • 1. Reported use of reporting guidelines among
    Botos J
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():7. PubMed ID: 30275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CORP: Assessing author compliance with data presentation guidelines for manuscript figures.
    Keehan KH; Gaffney MC; Zucker IH
    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):H1051-H1058. PubMed ID: 32196356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The validity of peer review in a general medicine journal.
    Jackson JL; Srinivasan M; Rea J; Fletcher KE; Kravitz RL
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22475. PubMed ID: 21799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Author perception of peer review.
    Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance.
    Ibragimova I; Fulbright H
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2024 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 38238865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of editors' subjective quality ratings of peer reviews of manuscripts.
    Callaham ML; Baxt WG; Waeckerle JF; Wears RL
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 9676664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.
    Dewey M; Levine D; Bossuyt PM; Kressel HY
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):3986-3995. PubMed ID: 30694365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: how reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers.
    Kliewer MA; DeLong DM; Freed K; Jenkins CB; Paulson EK; Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1545-50. PubMed ID: 15547189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Manuscript Review at the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition: The Impact of Reviewers on Editor Decisions.
    Kumar P; Ravindra A; Wang Y; Belli DC; Heyman MB; Gupta SK
    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2021 Nov; 73(5):567-571. PubMed ID: 34173794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A peek behind the curtain: peer review and editorial decision making at Stroke.
    Sposato LA; Ovbiagele B; Johnston SC; Fisher M; Saposnik G;
    Ann Neurol; 2014 Aug; 76(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 25043350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The research abstract: worth getting it right.
    Mcnamara ; Grannell M; Watson RG; Bouchier-Hayes DJ
    Ir J Med Sci; 2001; 170(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 11440411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shared burden is always lighter - Peer-review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010-2020.
    Bro T; Hammarfelt B
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 100(5):559-563. PubMed ID: 34608758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing of submissions to The Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health: Associations with the COVID-19 pandemic and editorial decisions.
    McGee RG; Graves LE; Barnett A
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2023 Jan; 59(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 36206278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective analysis of submissions, acceptance rate, open peer review operations, and prepublication bias of the multidisciplinary open access journal Head & Face Medicine.
    Stamm T; Meyer U; Wiesmann HP; Kleinheinz J; Cehreli M; Cehreli ZC
    Head Face Med; 2007 Jun; 3():27. PubMed ID: 17562003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A health sciences researcher's experience of manuscript review comments, 2020-2022.
    Joubert G
    S Afr Fam Pract (2004); 2023 Oct; 65(1):e1-e5. PubMed ID: 37916700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do manuscripts submitted to the Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation get rejected?
    Yanık B; Evcik D; Geler Külcü D; Koldaş Doğan Ş; Bardak AN; Zateri C; Sonel Tur B
    Turk J Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Dec; 69(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 38766586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Context-Aware Reviewer Assignment for Trust Enhanced Peer Review.
    Li L; Wang Y; Liu G; Wang M; Wu X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130493. PubMed ID: 26090849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.