These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30276086)

  • 1. Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?
    Voronov LI; Havey RM; Tsitsopoulos PP; Khayatzadeh S; Goodsitt J; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    Int J Spine Surg; 2018 Apr; 12(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30276086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinematic assessment of an elastic-core cervical disc prosthesis in one and two-level constructs.
    Guyer RD; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Carandang G; Blank KR; Werner S; Rubin J; Padovani N; Patwardhan AG
    JOR Spine; 2018 Dec; 1(4):e1040. PubMed ID: 31463455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Havey RM; Khayatzadeh S; Voronov LI; Blank KR; Carandang G; Harding DP; Patwardhan AG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Feb; 62():34-41. PubMed ID: 30665037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Cakir B; Richter M; Schmoelz W; Schmidt R; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S592-8. PubMed ID: 19882178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cervical total disc replacement on motion in the target and adjacent segments.
    Vogt M; Mehren C; Hackenbroch C; Wilke HJ
    Spine J; 2024 Jul; 24(7):1313-1322. PubMed ID: 38301903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Stability of a Stand-Alone Interbody Spacer in Two-Level and Hybrid Cervical Fusion Constructs.
    Kang DG; Wagner SC; Tracey RW; Cody JP; Gaume RE; Lehman RA
    Global Spine J; 2017 Oct; 7(7):681-688. PubMed ID: 28989848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis.
    Yu CC; Hao DJ; Ma YL; Huang DG; Li HK; Feng H; Hou Q
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 May; 22():1843-9. PubMed ID: 27243444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
    Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of cervical spine kinematics in complex, multiplanar motions after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and total disc replacement.
    Daniels AH; Paller DJ; Feller RJ; Thakur NA; Biercevicz AM; Palumbo MA; Crisco JJ; Madom IA
    Int J Spine Surg; 2012; 6():190-4. PubMed ID: 25694890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of cervical posterior foraminotomy on segmental range of motion in the setting of total disc arthroplasty.
    Bevevino AJ; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Gwinn DE; Dmitriev AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1572-7. PubMed ID: 24921846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices.
    Colman MW; Zavras AG; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Butler AJ; Singh K; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Oct; 37(4):556-562. PubMed ID: 35426820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.
    Patwardhan AG; Tzermiadianos MN; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Renner SM; Reo ML; Carandang G; Ritter-Lang K; Havey RM
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S618-29. PubMed ID: 20865285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Kinematics of progressive circumferential ligament resection (decompression) in conjunction with cervical disc arthroplasty in a spondylotic spine model.
    Roberto RF; McDonald T; Curtiss S; Neu CP; Kim K; Pennings F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(18):1676-83. PubMed ID: 20508554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel biomimetic artificial intervertebral disc in canine cervical cadaveric spines.
    Jacobs CAM; Doodkorte RJP; Kamali SA; Abdelgawad AM; Ghazanfari S; Jockenhoevel S; Arts JJC; Tryfonidou MA; Meij BP; Ito K
    JOR Spine; 2023 Jun; 6(2):e1251. PubMed ID: 37361332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical evaluation of a low profile, anchored cervical interbody spacer device in the setting of progressive flexion-distraction injury of the cervical spine.
    Wojewnik B; Ghanayem AJ; Tsitsopoulos PP; Voronov LI; Potluri T; Havey RM; Zelenakova J; Patel AA; Carandang G; Patwardhan AG
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 22850940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of posterior decompressive procedures on segmental range of motion after cervical total disc arthroplasty.
    Brody MJ; Patel AA; Ghanayem AJ; Wojewnik B; Carandang G; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Vastardis G; Potluri T; Patwardhan AG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(19):1558-63. PubMed ID: 24979138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Circumferential dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: a biomechanical analysis.
    Käfer W; Cakir B; Midderhoff S; Reichel H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2330-9. PubMed ID: 24722881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.