208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30276502)
1. Force matching as a stepping stone to QM/MM CB[8] host/guest binding free energies: a SAMPL6 cautionary tale.
Hudson PS; Han K; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):983-999. PubMed ID: 30276502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.
Han K; Hudson PS; Jones MR; Nishikawa N; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1059-1073. PubMed ID: 30084077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.
Rizzi A; Jensen T; Slochower DR; Aldeghi M; Gapsys V; Ntekoumes D; Bosisio S; Papadourakis M; Henriksen NM; de Groot BL; Cournia Z; Dickson A; Michel J; Gilson MK; Shirts MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):601-633. PubMed ID: 31984465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SAMPL6 host-guest challenge: binding free energies via a multistep approach.
Eken Y; Patel P; Díaz T; Jones MR; Wilson AK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 30225724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Overview of the SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinity prediction challenge.
Rizzi A; Murkli S; McNeill JN; Yao W; Sullivan M; Gilson MK; Chiu MW; Isaacs L; Gibb BC; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):937-963. PubMed ID: 30415285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absolute binding free energies for the SAMPL6 cucurbit[8]uril host-guest challenge via the AMOEBA polarizable force field.
Laury ML; Wang Z; Gordon AS; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1087-1095. PubMed ID: 30324303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.
Hudson PS; Aviat F; Meana-Pañeda R; Warrensford L; Pollard BC; Prasad S; Jones MR; Woodcock HL; Brooks BR
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2022 Apr; 36(4):263-277. PubMed ID: 35597880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binding free energies in the SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with MM and QM methods.
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Misini Ignjatović M; Wang M; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1027-1046. PubMed ID: 30203229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A "Stepping Stone" Approach for Obtaining Quantum Free Energies of Hydration.
Sampson C; Fox T; Tautermann CS; Woods C; Skylaris CK
J Phys Chem B; 2015 Jun; 119(23):7030-40. PubMed ID: 25985723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the accuracy of octanol-water partition coefficient predictions in the SAMPL6 Part II log P Challenge.
Işık M; Bergazin TD; Fox T; Rizzi A; Chodera JD; Mobley DL
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):335-370. PubMed ID: 32107702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binding free energies in the SAMPL5 octa-acid host-guest challenge calculated with DFT-D3 and CCSD(T).
Caldararu O; Olsson MA; Riplinger C; Neese F; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):87-106. PubMed ID: 27600554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.
Sun Z; He Q; Li X; Zhu Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):589-600. PubMed ID: 31974852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Blinded predictions of host-guest standard free energies of binding in the SAMPL5 challenge.
Bosisio S; Mey ASJS; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 27503495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. HYDROPHOBE Challenge: A Joint Experimental and Computational Study on the Host-Guest Binding of Hydrocarbons to Cucurbiturils, Allowing Explicit Evaluation of Guest Hydration Free-Energy Contributions.
Assaf KI; Florea M; Antony J; Henriksen NM; Yin J; Hansen A; Qu ZW; Sure R; Klapstein D; Gilson MK; Grimme S; Nau WM
J Phys Chem B; 2017 Dec; 121(49):11144-11162. PubMed ID: 29140701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Blinded predictions of standard binding free energies: lessons learned from the SAMPL6 challenge.
Papadourakis M; Bosisio S; Michel J
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 30159717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of octanol-water partition coefficients for the SAMPL6-[Formula: see text] molecules using molecular dynamics simulations with OPLS-AA, AMBER and CHARMM force fields.
Fan S; Iorga BI; Beckstein O
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):543-560. PubMed ID: 31960254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overview of the SAMPL6 pK
Işık M; Rustenburg AS; Rizzi A; Gunner MR; Mobley DL; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Feb; 35(2):131-166. PubMed ID: 33394238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: computing binding free energies and enthalpies from explicit solvent simulations by the attach-pull-release (APR) method.
Yin J; Henriksen NM; Slochower DR; Gilson MK
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Jan; 31(1):133-145. PubMed ID: 27638809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AMOEBA binding free energies for the SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest challenge.
Shi Y; Laury ML; Wang Z; Ponder JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2021 Jan; 35(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 33140208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
