These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30276646)

  • 1. Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Open Lymphadenectomy for Biliary Tumors: A Propensity-Score-Based, Case-Matched Analysis.
    Ratti F; Fiorentini G; Cipriani F; Paganelli M; Catena M; Aldrighetti L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):564-575. PubMed ID: 30276646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution.
    Ratti F; Cipriani F; Ariotti R; Gagliano A; Paganelli M; Catena M; Aldrighetti L
    Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1999-2010. PubMed ID: 26194257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IRON: A retrospective international multicenter study on robotic versus laparoscopic versus open approach in gallbladder cancer.
    Ielpo B; Vittoria d'Addetta M; Cremona S; Podda M; Di Martino M; Di Franco G; Furbetta N; Comandatore A; Giulianotti PC; Morelli L;
    Surgery; 2024 Oct; 176(4):1008-1015. PubMed ID: 39013674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic vs Open Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.
    Ratti F; Fiorentini G; Cipriani F; Catena M; Paganelli M; Aldrighetti L
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Nov; 153(11):1028-1035. PubMed ID: 30027220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.
    Takahara T; Wakabayashi G; Beppu T; Aihara A; Hasegawa K; Gotohda N; Hatano E; Tanahashi Y; Mizuguchi T; Kamiyama T; Ikeda T; Tanaka S; Taniai N; Baba H; Tanabe M; Kokudo N; Konishi M; Uemoto S; Sugioka A; Hirata K; Taketomi A; Maehara Y; Kubo S; Uchida E; Miyata H; Nakamura M; Kaneko H; Yamaue H; Miyazaki M; Takada T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Oct; 22(10):721-7. PubMed ID: 26096910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph dissection for advanced gastric cancer].
    Li Z; Shi Y; Zhao Y; Qian F; Hao Y; Tang B; Luo H; Wan Y; Yu P
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 19(5):530-4. PubMed ID: 27215520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical feasibility and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection: an IgoMILS (Italian Group of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery) registry-based study.
    Ruzzenente A; Ciangherotti A; Aldrighetti L; Ettorre GM; De Carlis L; Ferrero A; Dalla Valle R; Tisone G; Guglielmi A;
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1490-1499. PubMed ID: 33788031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Appraisal of disease-specific benefits of minimally invasiveness in surgery of breast cancer liver metastases.
    Ratti F; Serenari M; Zanello M; Prosperi E; Cipriani F; Ercolani G; Jovine E; Cescon M; Aldrighetti L
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 120(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 31502270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Severity of complications and long-term survival after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched, case-control study.
    Li Z; Bai B; Zhao Y; Yu D; Lian B; Liu Y; Zhao Q
    Int J Surg; 2018 Jun; 54(Pt A):62-69. PubMed ID: 29698790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SURVIVAL AND PERIOPERATIVE MORBIDITY OF TOTALLY LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN GASTRECTOMY FOR EARLY GASTRIC CANCER: ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE LATIN AMERICAN CENTRE.
    Norero E; Vargas C; Achurra P; Ceroni M; Mejia R; Martinez C; Muñoz R; Gonzalez P; Calvo A; Díaz A
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2019 Jan; 32(1):e1413. PubMed ID: 30624522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of laparoscopic and open D3 lymphadenectomy for transverse colon cancer.
    Kwak HD; Ju JK; Lee SY; Kim CH; Kim YJ; Kim HR
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 32(12):1733-1739. PubMed ID: 28879395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Approach for Lymphadenectomy in Biliary Tumors: The Missing Ring Between the Benefits of Laparoscopic and Reproducibility of Open Approach?
    Ratti F; Cipriani F; Ingallinella S; Tudisco A; Catena M; Aldrighetti L
    Ann Surg; 2023 Oct; 278(4):e780-e788. PubMed ID: 36341600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
    Lee W; Park JH; Kim JY; Kwag SJ; Park T; Jeong SH; Ju YT; Jung EJ; Lee YJ; Hong SC; Choi SK; Jeong CY
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Nov; 30(11):4835-4840. PubMed ID: 26902611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis.
    Bogani G; Cromi A; Uccella S; Serati M; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 24699300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.
    Beppu T; Wakabayashi G; Hasegawa K; Gotohda N; Mizuguchi T; Takahashi Y; Hirokawa F; Taniai N; Watanabe M; Katou M; Nagano H; Honda G; Baba H; Kokudo N; Konishi M; Hirata K; Yamamoto M; Uchiyama K; Uchida E; Kusachi S; Kubota K; Mori M; Takahashi K; Kikuchi K; Miyata H; Takahara T; Nakamura M; Kaneko H; Yamaue H; Miyazaki M; Takada T
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2015 Oct; 22(10):711-20. PubMed ID: 25902703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma: a case-control study.
    Caruso S; Patriti A; Marrelli D; Ceccarelli G; Ceribelli C; Roviello F; Casciola L
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 21984205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term results of laparoscopic versus open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients.
    Feliciotti F; Guerrieri M; Paganini AM; De Sanctis A; Campagnacci R; Perretta S; D'Ambrosio G; Lezoche E
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1530-5. PubMed ID: 12874687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: are we ready to step towards minimally invasiveness?
    Ratti F; Fiorentini G; Cipriani F; Catena M; Paganelli M; Aldrighetti L
    Updates Surg; 2020 Jun; 72(2):423-433. PubMed ID: 32221907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections.
    Ratti F; Rawashdeh A; Cipriani F; Primrose J; Fiorentini G; Abu Hilal M; Aldrighetti L
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1851-1862. PubMed ID: 32342213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Open versus laparoscopic portal lymphadenectomy in gallbladder cancer: is there a difference in lymph node yield?
    Ong CT; Leung K; Nussbaum DP; Sun Z; Gloor B; Blazer DG; Worni M
    HPB (Oxford); 2018 Jun; 20(6):505-513. PubMed ID: 29472106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.